QTSSX vs. QMLFX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QTSSX (Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund) and QMLFX (Quantified Market Leaders Fund) are both mutual funds - QTSSX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Advisors Preferred, while QMLFX is a Tactical Allocation fund managed by Advisors Preferred. Over the past 5 years, QTSSX returned -2.73%/yr vs 2.02%/yr for QMLFX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QTSSX charges 1.56%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for QMLFX.

Performance

QTSSX vs. QMLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund (QTSSX) and Quantified Market Leaders Fund (QMLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTSSX achieves a 15.00% return, which is significantly lower than QMLFX's 21.38% return.

QTSSX

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 2.78%
• YTD: 15.00%
• 6M: 12.62%
• 1Y: 34.40%
• 3Y*: 12.35%
• 5Y*: -2.73%
• 10Y*: —

QMLFX

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: 6.68%
• YTD: 21.38%
• 6M: 18.19%
• 1Y: 38.95%
• 3Y*: 13.55%
• 5Y*: 2.02%
• 10Y*: 11.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTSSX vs. QMLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QTSSX Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund	15.00%	4.10%	13.88%	13.97%	-27.55%	-16.61%
QMLFX Quantified Market Leaders Fund	21.38%	0.97%	11.05%	15.04%	-23.59%	-4.23%

Correlation

The correlation between QTSSX and QMLFX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2021	0.95

The correlation between QTSSX and QMLFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QTSSX vs. QMLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTSSX

QTSSX Risk / Return Rank: 47
QTSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
QTSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
QTSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
QTSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
QTSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

QMLFX

QMLFX Risk / Return Rank: 55
QMLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
QMLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
QMLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
QMLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
QMLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTSSX vs. QMLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund (QTSSX) and Quantified Market Leaders Fund (QMLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QTSSX	QMLFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	1.81	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.37	2.34	+0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.32	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.24	4.13	-0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.76	11.64	-2.89

QTSSX vs. QMLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTSSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the QMLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTSSX and QMLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QTSSX vs. QMLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTSSX drawdown since its inception was -52.27%, which is greater than QMLFX's maximum drawdown of -36.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTSSX and QMLFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QTSSX	QMLFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.27%	-36.59%	-15.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.53%	-10.07%	-1.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.77%	-27.21%	+2.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.20%	-34.07%	-15.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.24%	0.00%	-20.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.70%	-12.49%	-23.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.26%	3.56%	+0.70%

Volatility

QTSSX vs. QMLFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund (QTSSX) is 7.16%, while Quantified Market Leaders Fund (QMLFX) has a volatility of 11.85%. This indicates that QTSSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QMLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QTSSX	QMLFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.16%	11.85%	-4.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.18%	17.84%	-2.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.90%	23.04%	-2.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.25%	20.54%	+1.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.66%	21.24%	+2.42%

QTSSX vs. QMLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTSSX has a 1.56% expense ratio, which is higher than QMLFX's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

QTSSX vs. QMLFX - Dividend Comparison

QTSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than QMLFX's 1.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QMLFX Quantified Market Leaders Fund	1.13%	1.37%	0.00%	1.99%	0.00%	26.84%	9.58%	0.00%	15.63%	12.15%	2.22%	1.63%
QTSSX Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund	0.39%	0.45%	0.00%	6.30%	0.19%	3.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QTSSX and QMLFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, QTSSX and QMLFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, QTSSX or QMLFX?

QMLFX has higher volatility (11.85%) compared to QTSSX (7.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTSSX dropped -52.27% vs QMLFX's -36.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QMLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.