PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTR vs. DAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTR vs. DAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) and Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTR achieves a 17.64% return, which is significantly higher than DAX's -0.66% return.


QTR

1D
-0.24%
1M
10.52%
YTD
17.64%
6M
15.72%
1Y
33.76%
3Y*
22.93%
5Y*
10Y*

DAX

1D
-1.53%
1M
2.29%
YTD
-0.66%
6M
2.93%
1Y
3.88%
3Y*
17.88%
5Y*
7.71%
10Y*
8.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTR vs. DAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QTR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF
17.64%14.52%21.46%45.53%-29.94%4.16%
DAX
Global X DAX Germany ETF
-0.66%39.00%10.55%23.62%-18.47%-2.84%

Correlation

The correlation between QTR and DAX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021

0.56

The correlation between QTR and DAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (all time) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QTR vs. DAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QTR
DAX

Technology

53.8%
13.2%

Communication Services

15.8%
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
0.9%

Healthcare

4.2%
5.7%

Industrials

2.8%
34.8%

Utilities

1.4%
5.0%

Basic Materials

1.1%
5.3%

Energy

0.6%

-

Financial Services

0.2%
21.0%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.0%

Technology

QTR
53.8%
DAX
13.2%

Communication Services

QTR
15.8%
DAX
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

QTR
12.2%
DAX
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

QTR
7.7%
DAX
0.9%

Healthcare

QTR
4.2%
DAX
5.7%

Industrials

QTR
2.8%
DAX
34.8%

Utilities

QTR
1.4%
DAX
5.0%

Basic Materials

QTR
1.1%
DAX
5.3%

Energy

QTR
0.6%
DAX

-

Financial Services

QTR
0.2%
DAX
21.0%

Real Estate

QTR
0.1%
DAX
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTR vs. DAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTR
QTR Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
QTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTR Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
QTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTR Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

DAX
DAX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
DAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
DAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTR vs. DAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) and Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QTRDAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.05

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

0.26

+2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.47

0.83

+8.64

QTR vs. DAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTR Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the DAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTR and DAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QTRDAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

0.22

+2.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.35

+0.33

Drawdowns

QTR vs. DAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTR drawdown since its inception was -31.72%, smaller than the maximum DAX drawdown of -45.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTR and DAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTRDAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.72%

-45.58%

+13.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.29%

-14.82%

+2.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.99%

-16.03%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-4.63%

+4.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.84%

-10.51%

+1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.57%

4.68%

-1.11%

Volatility

QTR vs. DAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) is 4.52%, while Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) has a volatility of 6.09%. This indicates that QTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTRDAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

6.09%

-1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.68%

14.37%

-3.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.14%

17.66%

-3.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.10%

20.38%

-2.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.10%

21.28%

-3.18%

QTR vs. DAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DAX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

QTR vs. DAX - Dividend Comparison

QTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.96%, more than DAX's 1.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DAX
Global X DAX Germany ETF
1.48%1.47%2.24%2.48%2.80%2.65%2.25%2.47%3.33%1.73%1.78%1.41%
QTR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF
15.96%18.77%0.50%0.53%0.36%1.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QTR and DAX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DAX has higher volatility (6.09%) compared to QTR (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTR dropped -31.72% vs DAX's -45.58%.

On 3-year performance, QTR leads with 22.93% vs 17.88% for DAX. On fees, DAX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, QTR has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QTR has performed better with a 22.93% return vs 17.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DAX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QTR.

QTR has the higher dividend yield at 15.96%, compared with 1.48% for DAX.

QTR is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while DAX is Europe Equities. QTR tracks NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index, while DAX tracks DAX Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QTR and 0.20% for DAX.

QTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTR and DAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer