QTR vs. DAX
QTR (Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF) and DAX (Global X DAX Germany ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QTR is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index, while DAX is a Europe Equities fund tracking the DAX Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QTR returned 22.93%/yr vs 17.88%/yr for DAX. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QTR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for DAX.
Performance
QTR vs. DAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTR achieves a 17.64% return, which is significantly higher than DAX's -0.66% return.
QTR
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 10.52%
- YTD
- 17.64%
- 6M
- 15.72%
- 1Y
- 33.76%
- 3Y*
- 22.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DAX
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- 2.29%
- YTD
- -0.66%
- 6M
- 2.93%
- 1Y
- 3.88%
- 3Y*
- 17.88%
- 5Y*
- 7.71%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
QTR vs. DAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTR Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF | 17.64% | 14.52% | 21.46% | 45.53% | -29.94% | 4.16% |
DAX Global X DAX Germany ETF | -0.66% | 39.00% | 10.55% | 23.62% | -18.47% | -2.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTR and DAX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021 | 0.56 |
The correlation between QTR and DAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (all time) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QTR vs. DAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QTR
DAX
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
QTR
DAX
Communication Services
QTR
DAX
Consumer Cyclical
QTR
DAX
Consumer Defensive
QTR
DAX
Healthcare
QTR
DAX
Industrials
QTR
DAX
Utilities
QTR
DAX
Basic Materials
QTR
DAX
Energy
QTR
DAX
-
Financial Services
QTR
DAX
Real Estate
QTR
DAX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTR vs. DAX — Risk / Return Rank
QTR
DAX
QTR vs. DAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) and Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QTR | DAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.05 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 0.26 | +2.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.47 | 0.83 | +8.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTR | DAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 0.22 | +2.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.35 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
QTR vs. DAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTR drawdown since its inception was -31.72%, smaller than the maximum DAX drawdown of -45.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTR and DAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTR | DAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.72% | -45.58% | +13.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.29% | -14.82% | +2.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.99% | -16.03% | -2.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -4.63% | +4.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.84% | -10.51% | +1.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 4.68% | -1.11% |
Volatility
QTR vs. DAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) is 4.52%, while Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) has a volatility of 6.09%. This indicates that QTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTR | DAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 6.09% | -1.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.68% | 14.37% | -3.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.14% | 17.66% | -3.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 20.38% | -2.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 21.28% | -3.18% |
QTR vs. DAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DAX's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTR vs. DAX - Dividend Comparison
QTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.96%, more than DAX's 1.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAX Global X DAX Germany ETF | 1.48% | 1.47% | 2.24% | 2.48% | 2.80% | 2.65% | 2.25% | 2.47% | 3.33% | 1.73% | 1.78% | 1.41% |
QTR Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF | 15.96% | 18.77% | 0.50% | 0.53% | 0.36% | 1.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTR and DAX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DAX has higher volatility (6.09%) compared to QTR (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTR dropped -31.72% vs DAX's -45.58%.
On 3-year performance, QTR leads with 22.93% vs 17.88% for DAX. On fees, DAX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, QTR has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QTR has performed better with a 22.93% return vs 17.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DAX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QTR.
QTR has the higher dividend yield at 15.96%, compared with 1.48% for DAX.
QTR is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while DAX is Europe Equities. QTR tracks NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index, while DAX tracks DAX Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QTR and 0.20% for DAX.
QTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QTR and DAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer