PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTR vs. COPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTR vs. COPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTR achieves a 17.64% return, which is significantly lower than COPX's 25.71% return.


QTR

1D
-0.24%
1M
10.52%
YTD
17.64%
6M
15.72%
1Y
33.76%
3Y*
22.93%
5Y*
10Y*

COPX

1D
-3.64%
1M
17.74%
YTD
25.71%
6M
36.90%
1Y
120.82%
3Y*
37.36%
5Y*
19.87%
10Y*
21.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTR vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QTR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF
17.64%14.52%21.46%45.53%-29.94%4.16%
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
25.71%93.50%3.57%8.38%-0.76%5.96%

Correlation

The correlation between QTR and COPX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021

0.44

The correlation between QTR and COPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (all time) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QTR vs. COPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QTR
COPX

Technology

53.8%

-

Communication Services

15.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.7%

-

Healthcare

4.2%

-

Industrials

2.8%
3.7%

Utilities

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

1.1%
96.3%

Energy

0.6%

-

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

QTR
53.8%
COPX

-

Communication Services

QTR
15.8%
COPX

-

Consumer Cyclical

QTR
12.2%
COPX

-

Consumer Defensive

QTR
7.7%
COPX

-

Healthcare

QTR
4.2%
COPX

-

Industrials

QTR
2.8%
COPX
3.7%

Utilities

QTR
1.4%
COPX

-

Basic Materials

QTR
1.1%
COPX
96.3%

Energy

QTR
0.6%
COPX

-

Financial Services

QTR
0.2%
COPX

-

Real Estate

QTR
0.1%
COPX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTR vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTR
QTR Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
QTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTR Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
QTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTR Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

COPX
COPX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
COPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
COPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTR vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QTRCOPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.40

2.93

-0.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.22

3.17

+0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.42

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

4.37

-1.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.47

14.00

-4.53

QTR vs. COPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTR Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the COPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTR and COPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QTRCOPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

2.93

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.19

+0.49

Drawdowns

QTR vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTR drawdown since its inception was -31.72%, smaller than the maximum COPX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTR and COPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTRCOPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.72%

-83.16%

+51.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.29%

-27.82%

+15.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.99%

-39.72%

+20.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-5.69%

+5.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.84%

-39.30%

+30.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.57%

8.66%

-5.09%

Volatility

QTR vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) is 4.52%, while Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a volatility of 15.38%. This indicates that QTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTRCOPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

15.38%

-10.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.68%

35.68%

-25.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.14%

41.41%

-27.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.10%

36.51%

-18.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.10%

35.55%

-17.45%

QTR vs. COPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than COPX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

QTR vs. COPX - Dividend Comparison

QTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.96%, more than COPX's 2.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
2.13%2.68%1.80%2.39%3.14%1.48%1.30%1.37%2.59%1.57%0.60%1.20%
QTR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF
15.96%18.77%0.50%0.53%0.36%1.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QTR and COPX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COPX has higher volatility (15.38%) compared to QTR (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTR dropped -31.72% vs COPX's -83.16%.

On 3-year performance, COPX leads with 37.36% vs 22.93% for QTR. On fees, QTR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QTR has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, COPX has performed better with a 37.36% return vs 22.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QTR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPX.

QTR has the higher dividend yield at 15.96%, compared with 2.13% for COPX.

QTR is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while COPX is Materials. QTR tracks NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index, while COPX tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QTR and 0.65% for COPX.

COPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTR and COPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer