QTPI vs. EPRF
QTPI (North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF) and EPRF (Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. QTPI is actively managed, while EPRF is passively managed. Over the past year, QTPI returned 4.58% vs -1.05% for EPRF. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QTPI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for EPRF.
Performance
QTPI vs. EPRF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTPI achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly higher than EPRF's -2.15% return.
QTPI
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 0.98%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 1Y
- 4.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EPRF
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- 6M
- -4.59%
- YTD
- -2.15%
- 1Y
- -1.05%
- 3Y*
- 3.16%
- 5Y*
- -2.02%
- 10Y*
- —
QTPI vs. EPRF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QTPI North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF | 1.42% | 7.37% | 0.19% |
EPRF Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF | -2.15% | 2.69% | -1.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTPI and EPRF is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024 | 0.59 |
The correlation between QTPI and EPRF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTPI vs. EPRF — Risk / Return Rank
QTPI
EPRF
QTPI vs. EPRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF (QTPI) and Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QTPI | EPRF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 0.98 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | -0.12 | +2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.82 | -0.23 | +9.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QTPI vs. EPRF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTPI drawdown since its inception was -4.08%, smaller than the maximum EPRF drawdown of -26.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTPI and EPRF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTPI | EPRF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.08% | -26.82% | +22.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.11% | -8.59% | +6.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | -10.84% | +10.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.39% | -7.42% | +7.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.52% | 4.61% | -4.09% |
Volatility
QTPI vs. EPRF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF (QTPI) is 1.08%, while Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) has a volatility of 2.31%. This indicates that QTPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPRF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTPI | EPRF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.08% | 2.31% | -1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.26% | 5.57% | -2.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.11% | 7.45% | -3.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.92% | 11.85% | -6.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.92% | 13.42% | -8.50% |
QTPI vs. EPRF - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTPI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than EPRF's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTPI vs. EPRF - Dividend Comparison
QTPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, less than EPRF's 6.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPRF Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF | 6.17% | 6.03% | 6.13% | 5.71% | 5.67% | 4.70% | 4.92% | 5.01% | 5.27% | 2.59% |
QTPI North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF | 4.41% | 4.58% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTPI and EPRF have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EPRF has higher volatility (2.31%) compared to QTPI (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTPI dropped -4.08% vs EPRF's -26.82%.
On 1-year performance, QTPI leads with 4.58% vs -1.05% for EPRF. On fees, EPRF is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, QTPI has been the lower-risk option at 1.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QTPI has performed better with a 4.58% return vs -1.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EPRF is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QTPI.
EPRF has the higher dividend yield at 6.17%, compared with 4.41% for QTPI.
They also come from different issuers: North Square and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QTPI and 0.47% for EPRF.
QTPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QTPI and EPRF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer