QTEC vs. IYW
QTEC (First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund) and IYW (iShares U.S. Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QTEC is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index, while IYW is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QTEC returned 22.85%/yr vs 26.00%/yr for IYW. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QTEC charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for IYW.
Performance
QTEC vs. IYW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTEC achieves a 43.17% return, which is significantly higher than IYW's 28.46% return. Over the past 10 years, QTEC has underperformed IYW with an annualized return of 22.85%, while IYW has yielded a comparatively higher 26.00% annualized return.
QTEC
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- 18.57%
- YTD
- 43.17%
- 6M
- 39.34%
- 1Y
- 64.90%
- 3Y*
- 32.59%
- 5Y*
- 17.36%
- 10Y*
- 22.85%
IYW
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 13.87%
- YTD
- 28.46%
- 6M
- 27.22%
- 1Y
- 58.25%
- 3Y*
- 35.17%
- 5Y*
- 22.76%
- 10Y*
- 26.00%
QTEC vs. IYW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTEC First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund | 43.17% | 22.28% | 7.32% | 67.02% | -39.83% | 26.89% | 38.76% | 48.22% | -4.62% | 37.78% |
IYW iShares U.S. Technology ETF | 28.46% | 25.38% | 30.25% | 65.44% | -34.83% | 35.44% | 47.45% | 46.64% | -0.93% | 36.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTEC and IYW is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2006 | 0.91 |
The correlation between QTEC and IYW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTEC vs. IYW — Risk / Return Rank
QTEC
IYW
QTEC vs. IYW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) and iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QTEC | IYW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.47 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.07 | 3.29 | +0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.17 | 10.76 | +2.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTEC | IYW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.84 | 2.92 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.88 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 1.04 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.35 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
QTEC vs. IYW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTEC drawdown since its inception was -58.86%, smaller than the maximum IYW drawdown of -81.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTEC and IYW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTEC | IYW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.86% | -81.90% | +23.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.03% | -17.81% | +1.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.00% | -26.47% | -2.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.54% | -39.44% | -6.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.54% | -39.44% | -6.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.08% | -1.35% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.89% | -34.65% | +24.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.94% | 5.43% | -0.49% |
Volatility
QTEC vs. IYW - Volatility Comparison
First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) has a higher volatility of 7.51% compared to iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) at 6.28%. This indicates that QTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTEC | IYW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.51% | 6.28% | +1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.24% | 15.84% | +2.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.97% | 20.07% | +2.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.17% | 25.86% | +3.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.50% | 25.09% | +2.41% |
QTEC vs. IYW - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTEC has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than IYW's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTEC vs. IYW - Dividend Comparison
QTEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IYW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYW iShares U.S. Technology ETF | 0.11% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.34% | 0.50% | 0.31% | 0.56% | 0.72% | 0.92% | 0.82% | 1.14% | 1.12% |
QTEC First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.14% | 0.15% | 0.02% | 0.44% | 0.68% | 0.91% | 0.80% | 1.29% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTEC and IYW have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QTEC has higher volatility (7.51%) compared to IYW (6.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTEC dropped -58.86% vs IYW's -81.90%.
On 10-year performance, IYW leads with 26.00% vs 22.85% for QTEC. On fees, IYW is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IYW has been the lower-risk option at 6.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IYW has performed better with a 26.00% return vs 22.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IYW is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for QTEC.
IYW has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for QTEC.
QTEC is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while IYW is Technology Equities. QTEC tracks NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index, while IYW tracks Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for QTEC and 0.38% for IYW.
IYW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QTEC and IYW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer