QTAP vs. TPYP
QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) and TPYP (Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - QTAP is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Innovator, while TPYP is a MLPs fund tracking the Tortoise North American Pipeline Index. QTAP is actively managed, while TPYP is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QTAP returned 12.49%/yr vs 18.93%/yr for TPYP. Their 0.28 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. QTAP charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for TPYP.
Performance
QTAP vs. TPYP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTAP achieves a 15.59% return, which is significantly lower than TPYP's 20.31% return.
QTAP
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- 6M
- 15.02%
- YTD
- 15.59%
- 1Y
- 21.61%
- 3Y*
- 20.08%
- 5Y*
- 12.49%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.79%
TPYP
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 10.96%
- YTD
- 20.31%
- 1Y
- 22.13%
- 3Y*
- 23.42%
- 5Y*
- 18.93%
- 10Y*
- 11.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $241.79K | $219.11K | $201.05K | |
| $2.68M | $2.32M | $2.66M |
QTAP vs. TPYP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 15.59% | 19.36% | 17.34% | 43.32% | -25.87% | 15.95% |
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 20.31% | 7.59% | 37.37% | 10.51% | 16.09% | 13.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTAP and TPYP is -0.24, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2021 | 0.28 |
The correlation between QTAP and TPYP shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QTAP vs. TPYP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QTAP
TPYP
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
QTAP
TPYP
-
Communication Services
QTAP
TPYP
-
Consumer Cyclical
QTAP
TPYP
-
Consumer Defensive
QTAP
TPYP
-
Healthcare
QTAP
TPYP
-
Industrials
QTAP
TPYP
Utilities
QTAP
TPYP
Basic Materials
QTAP
TPYP
Energy
QTAP
TPYP
Financial Services
QTAP
TPYP
Real Estate
QTAP
TPYP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTAP vs. TPYP — Risk / Return Rank
QTAP
TPYP
QTAP vs. TPYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QTAP | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.78 | 1.27 | +0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.72 | 3.25 | +4.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 37.02 | 7.64 | +29.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QTAP vs. TPYP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTAP drawdown since its inception was -29.44%, smaller than the maximum TPYP drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTAP and TPYP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTAP | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.44% | -51.91% | +22.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.81% | -6.84% | +4.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.03% | -13.17% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.44% | -17.96% | -11.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.54% | +5.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.90% | -7.82% | +2.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.59% | 2.91% | -2.32% |
Volatility
QTAP vs. TPYP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) is 2.79%, while Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) has a volatility of 4.74%. This indicates that QTAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TPYP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTAP | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.79% | 4.74% | -1.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.78% | 11.18% | -5.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.60% | 13.98% | -7.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 17.41% | +1.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.55% | 21.90% | -3.35% |
QTAP vs. TPYP - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTAP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than TPYP's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTAP vs. TPYP - Dividend Comparison
QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TPYP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 3.28% | 3.91% | 3.95% | 4.83% | 4.48% | 4.86% | 6.14% | 4.45% | 4.58% | 3.71% | 3.49% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTAP and TPYP have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TPYP has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to QTAP (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTAP dropped -29.44% vs TPYP's -51.91%.
On 5-year performance, TPYP leads with 18.93% vs 12.49% for QTAP. On fees, TPYP is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TPYP has performed better with a 18.93% return vs 12.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TPYP is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QTAP.
TPYP has the higher dividend yield at 3.28%, compared with 0.00% for QTAP.
QTAP is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TPYP is MLPs. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Tortoise. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QTAP and 0.40% for TPYP.
QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QTAP and TPYP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer