QTAP vs. LINT
QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QTAP charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.
Performance
QTAP vs. LINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTAP achieves a 15.59% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 348.80% return.
QTAP
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- 6M
- 15.02%
- YTD
- 15.59%
- 1Y
- 21.61%
- 3Y*
- 20.08%
- 5Y*
- 12.49%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.79%
LINT
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -36.81%
- 6M
- 190.09%
- YTD
- 348.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $20.84M | $19.76M | $34.13M | |
| $241.79K | $219.11K | $201.05K |
QTAP vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 15.59% | 2.50% |
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 348.80% | 5.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTAP and LINT is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.52 |
QTAP vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QTAP
LINT
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
QTAP
LINT
Communication Services
QTAP
LINT
-
Consumer Cyclical
QTAP
LINT
-
Consumer Defensive
QTAP
LINT
-
Healthcare
QTAP
LINT
-
Industrials
QTAP
LINT
-
Utilities
QTAP
LINT
-
Basic Materials
QTAP
LINT
-
Energy
QTAP
LINT
-
Financial Services
QTAP
LINT
-
Real Estate
QTAP
LINT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTAP vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank
QTAP
LINT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QTAP vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QTAP | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.78 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.72 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 37.02 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QTAP vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTAP drawdown since its inception was -29.44%, smaller than the maximum LINT drawdown of -69.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTAP and LINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTAP | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.44% | -69.02% | +39.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -53.71% | +53.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.90% | -24.41% | +19.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.59% | — | — |
Volatility
QTAP vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTAP | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.79% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.78% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.60% | 169.88% | -163.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 169.88% | -150.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.55% | 169.88% | -151.33% |
QTAP vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTAP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTAP vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison
QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 0.61% | 0.25% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTAP and LINT have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.
LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.00% for QTAP.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QTAP and 0.97% for LINT.
Find the right allocation for QTAP and LINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer