PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTAP vs. DFAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QTAP vs. DFAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) and Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QTAP vs. DFAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QTAP
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April
3.02%19.36%17.34%43.32%-25.87%15.63%
DFAU
Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF
-2.67%16.78%23.17%24.79%-16.99%17.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTAP achieves a 3.02% return, which is significantly higher than DFAU's -2.67% return.


QTAP

1D
1.74%
1M
1.79%
YTD
3.02%
6M
5.43%
1Y
21.08%
3Y*
19.58%
5Y*
10Y*

DFAU

1D
0.71%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
-2.67%
6M
-0.51%
1Y
19.02%
3Y*
17.82%
5Y*
11.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QTAP vs. DFAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTAP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAU's 0.12% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QTAP vs. DFAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTAP
QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAU
DFAU Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
DFAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAU Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAU Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTAP vs. DFAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) and Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QTAPDFAUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.29

1.03

+0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.05

1.56

+0.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.24

+0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

1.56

+0.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.95

7.42

+5.52

QTAP vs. DFAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTAP Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the DFAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTAP and DFAU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QTAPDFAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

1.03

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.80

-0.16

Correlation

The correlation between QTAP and DFAU is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QTAP vs. DFAU - Dividend Comparison

QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DFAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.


TTM202520242023202220212020
QTAP
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DFAU
Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF
1.03%0.95%1.10%1.29%1.40%1.00%0.13%

Drawdowns

QTAP vs. DFAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTAP drawdown since its inception was -29.44%, which is greater than DFAU's maximum drawdown of -23.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTAP and DFAU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QTAPDFAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.44%

-23.61%

-5.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.04%

-12.45%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.36%

+5.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.21%

-5.12%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

2.62%

-0.94%

Volatility

QTAP vs. DFAU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) is 1.88%, while Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) has a volatility of 5.39%. This indicates that QTAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QTAPDFAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.88%

5.39%

-3.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.23%

9.67%

-6.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.38%

18.52%

-2.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.03%

17.03%

+2.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.03%

16.87%

+2.16%