QSR vs. SLF
QSR (Restaurant Brands International Inc.) and SLF (Sun Life Financial Inc.) are both stocks. QSR operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical), while SLF operates in Insurance - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, QSR returned 8.30%/yr vs 14.00%/yr for SLF. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QSR vs. SLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSR achieves a 9.20% return, which is significantly lower than SLF's 33.00% return. Over the past 10 years, QSR has underperformed SLF with an annualized return of 8.30%, while SLF has yielded a comparatively higher 14.00% annualized return.
QSR
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- 6M
- 9.54%
- YTD
- 9.20%
- 1Y
- 6.39%
- 3Y*
- 1.46%
- 5Y*
- 5.74%
- 10Y*
- 8.30%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.42%
SLF
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 4.90%
- 6M
- 32.93%
- YTD
- 33.00%
- 1Y
- 35.62%
- 3Y*
- 21.04%
- 5Y*
- 14.81%
- 10Y*
- 14.00%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.23%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $193.10M | $225.34M | $259.47M | |
| $48.77M | $44.56M | $50.72M |
QSR vs. SLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSR Restaurant Brands International Inc. | 9.20% | 8.64% | -13.80% | 24.64% | 10.72% | 2.72% | -0.34% | 25.61% | -12.15% | 30.69% |
SLF Sun Life Financial Inc. | 33.00% | 9.72% | 19.48% | 17.77% | -12.89% | 29.71% | 1.55% | 42.69% | -16.37% | 11.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between QSR and SLF is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2014 | 0.38 |
The correlation between QSR and SLF shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
QSR:
$25.38B
SLF:
$45.07B
QSR:
$2.09
SLF:
CA$6.39
QSR:
35.07
SLF:
17.94
QSR:
3.49
SLF:
1.49
QSR:
8.98
SLF:
2.02
QSR:
$9.59B
SLF:
CA$39.40B
QSR:
$3.17B
SLF:
CA$20.48B
QSR:
$2.49B
SLF:
CA$4.74B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QSR vs. SLF — Risk / Return Rank
QSR
SLF
QSR vs. SLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) and Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QSR | SLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.34 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.49 | 3.56 | -3.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.98 | 9.03 | -8.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QSR vs. SLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSR drawdown since its inception was -63.03%, smaller than the maximum SLF drawdown of -78.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSR and SLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSR | SLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.03% | -78.60% | +15.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.04% | -10.06% | -2.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.53% | -14.91% | -9.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.27% | -30.77% | +1.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.03% | -50.84% | -12.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.57% | -0.53% | -9.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.01% | -16.80% | +4.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.63% | 3.96% | +2.67% |
Volatility
QSR vs. SLF - Volatility Comparison
Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) has a higher volatility of 8.31% compared to Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF) at 4.26%. This indicates that QSR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QSR | SLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.31% | 4.26% | +4.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.78% | 14.46% | +4.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.16% | 19.80% | +4.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.90% | 19.38% | +3.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.53% | 22.68% | +4.85% |
Dividends
QSR vs. SLF - Dividend Comparison
QSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, more than SLF's 3.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSR Restaurant Brands International Inc. | 3.47% | 3.63% | 3.56% | 2.82% | 3.34% | 3.49% | 3.40% | 3.14% | 3.44% | 1.27% | 1.30% | 1.18% |
SLF Sun Life Financial Inc. | 3.27% | 4.03% | 4.00% | 4.98% | 4.59% | 3.32% | 3.69% | 3.47% | 4.71% | 3.17% | 3.98% | 4.64% |
Financials
QSR vs. SLF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Restaurant Brands International Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
QSR vs. SLF - Profitability Comparison
QSR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
SLF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Sun Life Financial Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.88B and revenue of 8.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
QSR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported an operating income of 606.00M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.8%.
SLF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Sun Life Financial Inc. reported an operating income of 633.63M and revenue of 8.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.
QSR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a net income of 338.00M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.
SLF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Sun Life Financial Inc. reported a net income of 537.39M and revenue of 8.88B, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
QSR and SLF have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QSR has higher volatility (8.31%) compared to SLF (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSR dropped -63.03% vs SLF's -78.60%.
SLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QSR and SLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer