QSR vs. HLT
QSR (Restaurant Brands International Inc.) and HLT (Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — QSR in Restaurants, HLT in Lodging. Over the past 10 years, QSR returned 9.02%/yr vs 48.93%/yr for HLT. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QSR vs. HLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSR achieves a 10.67% return, which is significantly lower than HLT's 20.55% return. Over the past 10 years, QSR has underperformed HLT with an annualized return of 9.02%, while HLT has yielded a comparatively higher 48.93% annualized return.
QSR
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- -2.08%
- YTD
- 10.67%
- 6M
- 7.50%
- 1Y
- 13.67%
- 3Y*
- 3.14%
- 5Y*
- 5.51%
- 10Y*
- 9.02%
HLT
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 11.14%
- YTD
- 20.55%
- 6M
- 23.56%
- 1Y
- 38.36%
- 3Y*
- 34.51%
- 5Y*
- 22.21%
- 10Y*
- 48.93%
QSR vs. HLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSR Restaurant Brands International Inc. | 10.67% | 8.64% | -13.80% | 24.64% | 10.72% | 2.72% | -0.34% | 25.61% | -12.15% | 30.69% |
HLT Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. | 20.55% | 16.49% | 36.11% | 44.68% | -18.72% | 40.20% | 0.47% | 55.48% | -9.40% | 829.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between QSR and HLT is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2014 | 0.39 |
The correlation between QSR and HLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
QSR:
$34.36B
HLT:
$80.26B
QSR:
$2.09
HLT:
$6.50
QSR:
35.86
HLT:
53.23
QSR:
3.57
HLT:
6.68
QSR:
$9.59B
HLT:
$12.28B
QSR:
$3.17B
HLT:
$5.44B
QSR:
$2.49B
HLT:
$3.00B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QSR vs. HLT — Risk / Return Rank
QSR
HLT
QSR vs. HLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QSR | HLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.29 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.03 | 3.75 | -2.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.28 | 8.72 | -6.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QSR vs. HLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSR drawdown since its inception was -63.03%, which is greater than HLT's maximum drawdown of -50.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSR and HLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSR | HLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.03% | -50.82% | -12.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.29% | -10.29% | -3.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.53% | -26.35% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.27% | -32.65% | +3.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.03% | -50.82% | -12.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.35% | 0.00% | -8.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.04% | -9.71% | -2.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.04% | 4.42% | +1.62% |
Volatility
QSR vs. HLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) is 5.40%, while Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) has a volatility of 6.84%. This indicates that QSR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QSR | HLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.40% | 6.84% | -1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.04% | 17.39% | -0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.04% | 23.16% | -0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.66% | 27.06% | -4.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.52% | 180.96% | -153.44% |
Dividends
QSR vs. HLT - Dividend Comparison
QSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than HLT's 0.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLT Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. | 0.17% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.33% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.54% | 0.84% | 31.40% | 1.03% | 0.65% |
QSR Restaurant Brands International Inc. | 3.35% | 3.63% | 3.56% | 2.82% | 3.34% | 3.49% | 3.40% | 3.14% | 3.44% | 1.27% | 1.30% | 1.18% |
Financials
QSR vs. HLT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Restaurant Brands International Inc. and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
QSR vs. HLT - Profitability Comparison
QSR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
HLT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.18B and revenue of 2.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.3%.
QSR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported an operating income of 606.00M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.8%.
HLT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 678.00M and revenue of 2.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.1%.
QSR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a net income of 338.00M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.
HLT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 385.00M and revenue of 2.94B, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
QSR and HLT have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HLT has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to QSR (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSR dropped -63.03% vs HLT's -50.82%.
HLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QSR and HLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer