PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QSR vs. GOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

QSR vs. GOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) and Alphabet Inc (GOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSR achieves a 10.67% return, which is significantly lower than GOOG's 14.29% return. Over the past 10 years, QSR has underperformed GOOG with an annualized return of 9.02%, while GOOG has yielded a comparatively higher 25.97% annualized return.


QSR

1D
1.29%
1M
-2.08%
YTD
10.67%
6M
7.50%
1Y
13.67%
3Y*
3.14%
5Y*
5.51%
10Y*
9.02%

GOOG

1D
0.45%
1M
-10.19%
YTD
14.29%
6M
15.49%
1Y
102.96%
3Y*
42.67%
5Y*
23.51%
10Y*
25.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QSR vs. GOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QSR
Restaurant Brands International Inc.
10.67%8.64%-13.80%24.64%10.72%2.72%-0.34%25.61%-12.15%30.69%
GOOG
Alphabet Inc
14.29%65.42%35.62%58.83%-38.67%65.17%31.03%29.10%-1.03%35.58%

Correlation

The correlation between QSR and GOOG is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2014

0.31

The correlation between QSR and GOOG shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

QSR:

$34.36B

GOOG:

$4.38T

EPS

QSR:

$2.09

GOOG:

$13.11

PE Ratio

QSR:

35.86

GOOG:

27.31

PS Ratio

QSR:

3.57

GOOG:

10.35

PB Ratio

QSR:

9.18

GOOG:

9.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

QSR:

$9.59B

GOOG:

$422.57B

Gross Profit (TTM)

QSR:

$3.17B

GOOG:

$255.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

QSR:

$2.49B

GOOG:

$174.08B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QSR vs. GOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSR
QSR Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
QSR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSR Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QSR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSR Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOG
GOOG Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSR vs. GOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) and Alphabet Inc (GOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QSRGOOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.59

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

4.99

-3.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.28

17.56

-15.28

QSR vs. GOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QSR Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the GOOG Sharpe Ratio of 3.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSR and GOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QSR vs. GOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSR drawdown since its inception was -63.03%, which is greater than GOOG's maximum drawdown of -44.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSR and GOOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QSRGOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.03%

-44.60%

-18.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.29%

-20.75%

+7.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.53%

-29.35%

+4.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.27%

-44.60%

+15.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.03%

-44.60%

-18.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.35%

-10.19%

+1.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.04%

-8.89%

-3.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.04%

5.88%

+0.16%

Volatility

QSR vs. GOOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) is 5.40%, while Alphabet Inc (GOOG) has a volatility of 7.29%. This indicates that QSR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QSRGOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.40%

7.29%

-1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.04%

20.47%

-3.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.04%

28.75%

-5.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.66%

31.15%

-8.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.52%

29.02%

-1.50%

Dividends

QSR vs. GOOG - Dividend Comparison

QSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than GOOG's 0.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOOG
Alphabet Inc
0.24%0.26%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QSR
Restaurant Brands International Inc.
3.35%3.63%3.56%2.82%3.34%3.49%3.40%3.14%3.44%1.27%1.30%1.18%

Financials

QSR vs. GOOG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Restaurant Brands International Inc. and Alphabet Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20222023202420252026
2.26B
109.90B
(QSR) Total Revenue
(GOOG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

QSR vs. GOOG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Restaurant Brands International Inc. and Alphabet Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%202220232024202520260
62.5%
Portfolio components
QSR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

GOOG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc reported a gross profit of 68.63B and revenue of 109.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.5%.

QSR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported an operating income of 606.00M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.8%.

GOOG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc reported an operating income of 39.70B and revenue of 109.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.1%.

QSR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a net income of 338.00M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.

GOOG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc reported a net income of 62.58B and revenue of 109.90B, resulting in a net margin of 56.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


QSR and GOOG have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOOG has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to QSR (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSR dropped -63.03% vs GOOG's -44.60%.

GOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.60 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QSR and GOOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer