QSR vs. BCE
QSR (Restaurant Brands International Inc.) and BCE (BCE Inc.) are both stocks. QSR operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical), while BCE operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, QSR returned 8.30%/yr vs -1.98%/yr for BCE. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QSR vs. BCE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSR achieves a 9.20% return, which is significantly higher than BCE's -7.51% return. Over the past 10 years, QSR has outperformed BCE with an annualized return of 8.30%, while BCE has yielded a comparatively lower -1.98% annualized return.
QSR
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- 6M
- 9.54%
- YTD
- 9.20%
- 1Y
- 6.39%
- 3Y*
- 1.46%
- 5Y*
- 5.74%
- 10Y*
- 8.30%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.42%
BCE
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -5.17%
- 6M
- -10.11%
- YTD
- -7.51%
- 1Y
- -7.22%
- 3Y*
- -15.49%
- 5Y*
- -9.40%
- 10Y*
- -1.98%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
BCE BCE Inc. | $79.62M | $87.04M | $86.61M |
| $193.10M | $225.34M | $259.47M |
QSR vs. BCE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSR Restaurant Brands International Inc. | 9.20% | 8.64% | -13.80% | 24.64% | 10.72% | 2.72% | -0.34% | 25.61% | -12.15% | 30.69% |
BCE BCE Inc. | -7.51% | 10.25% | -35.53% | -4.16% | -10.62% | 28.62% | -1.95% | 23.38% | -13.02% | 16.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between QSR and BCE is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2014 | 0.33 |
The correlation between QSR and BCE shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
QSR:
$25.38B
BCE:
$20.03B
QSR:
$2.09
BCE:
CA$6.75
QSR:
35.07
BCE:
4.49
QSR:
3.49
BCE:
1.14
QSR:
8.98
BCE:
1.40
QSR:
$9.59B
BCE:
CA$24.70B
QSR:
$3.17B
BCE:
CA$8.56B
QSR:
$2.49B
BCE:
CA$15.98B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QSR vs. BCE — Risk / Return Rank
QSR
BCE
QSR vs. BCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) and BCE Inc. (BCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QSR | BCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.95 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.49 | -0.38 | +0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.98 | -0.95 | +1.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QSR vs. BCE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSR drawdown since its inception was -63.03%, roughly equal to the maximum BCE drawdown of -60.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSR and BCE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSR | BCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.03% | -60.67% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.04% | -19.07% | +6.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.53% | -44.98% | +20.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.27% | -55.42% | +26.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.03% | -55.42% | -7.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.57% | -50.99% | +41.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.01% | -12.93% | +0.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.63% | 7.64% | -1.01% |
Volatility
QSR vs. BCE - Volatility Comparison
Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) and BCE Inc. (BCE) have volatilities of 8.31% and 7.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QSR | BCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.31% | 7.95% | +0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.78% | 14.63% | +4.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.16% | 19.36% | +4.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.90% | 19.31% | +3.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.53% | 19.36% | +8.17% |
Dividends
QSR vs. BCE - Dividend Comparison
QSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, less than BCE's 5.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCE BCE Inc. | 5.86% | 6.98% | 12.47% | 7.29% | 6.39% | 5.37% | 5.82% | 5.16% | 5.84% | 4.63% | 5.15% | 6.00% |
QSR Restaurant Brands International Inc. | 3.47% | 3.63% | 3.56% | 2.82% | 3.34% | 3.49% | 3.40% | 3.14% | 3.44% | 1.27% | 1.30% | 1.18% |
Financials
QSR vs. BCE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Restaurant Brands International Inc. and BCE Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
QSR vs. BCE - Profitability Comparison
QSR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
BCE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, BCE Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.86B and revenue of 6.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.0%.
QSR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported an operating income of 606.00M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.8%.
BCE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, BCE Inc. reported an operating income of 1.28B and revenue of 6.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.
QSR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a net income of 338.00M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.
BCE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, BCE Inc. reported a net income of 654.69M and revenue of 6.18B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
QSR and BCE have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QSR has higher volatility (8.31%) compared to BCE (7.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSR dropped -63.03% vs BCE's -60.67%.
QSR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.27 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QSR and BCE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer