BCE vs. GIS
BCE (BCE Inc.) and GIS (General Mills, Inc.) are both stocks. BCE operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while GIS operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, BCE returned -1.06%/yr vs -3.13%/yr for GIS. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BCE vs. GIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCE achieves a -2.47% return, which is significantly higher than GIS's -26.06% return. Over the past 10 years, BCE has outperformed GIS with an annualized return of -1.06%, while GIS has yielded a comparatively lower -3.13% annualized return.
BCE
- 1D
- -2.71%
- 1M
- -6.74%
- YTD
- -2.47%
- 6M
- 2.21%
- 1Y
- 9.86%
- 3Y*
- -14.08%
- 5Y*
- -8.44%
- 10Y*
- -1.06%
GIS
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- -26.06%
- 6M
- -27.47%
- 1Y
- -33.51%
- 3Y*
- -22.46%
- 5Y*
- -7.46%
- 10Y*
- -3.13%
BCE vs. GIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCE BCE Inc. | -2.47% | 10.25% | -35.53% | -4.16% | -10.62% | 28.62% | -1.95% | 23.38% | -13.02% | 16.52% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | -26.06% | -23.75% | 1.45% | -19.97% | 28.09% | 18.53% | 13.60% | 43.13% | -31.57% | -0.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCE and GIS is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 1983 | 0.21 |
The correlation between BCE and GIS shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BCE:
$21.12B
GIS:
$18.09B
BCE:
CA$6.75
GIS:
$4.08
BCE:
4.76
GIS:
8.17
BCE:
0.01
GIS:
3.52
BCE:
1.21
GIS:
0.98
BCE:
1.48
GIS:
1.94
BCE:
CA$24.70B
GIS:
$18.37B
BCE:
CA$8.56B
GIS:
$4.70B
BCE:
CA$15.98B
GIS:
$3.03B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCE vs. GIS — Risk / Return Rank
BCE
GIS
BCE vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BCE Inc. (BCE) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCE | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 0.77 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.81 | -0.91 | +1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.60 | -1.80 | +3.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCE vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCE drawdown since its inception was -60.67%, roughly equal to the maximum GIS drawdown of -59.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCE and GIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCE | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.67% | -59.63% | -1.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.27% | -36.85% | +24.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.88% | -55.32% | +8.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.42% | -59.63% | +4.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.42% | -59.63% | +4.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.32% | -58.17% | +9.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.86% | -10.30% | -2.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.17% | 18.61% | -12.44% |
Volatility
BCE vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BCE Inc. (BCE) is 5.65%, while General Mills, Inc. (GIS) has a volatility of 6.67%. This indicates that BCE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCE | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.65% | 6.67% | -1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.17% | 18.59% | -5.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.60% | 24.08% | -5.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.03% | 21.17% | -2.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.24% | 22.13% | -2.89% |
Dividends
BCE vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison
BCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.55%, less than GIS's 7.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCE BCE Inc. | 5.55% | 6.98% | 12.47% | 7.29% | 6.39% | 5.37% | 5.82% | 5.16% | 5.84% | 4.63% | 5.15% | 6.00% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 7.32% | 5.20% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% |
Financials
BCE vs. GIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BCE Inc. and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BCE vs. GIS - Profitability Comparison
BCE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BCE Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.86B and revenue of 6.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.0%.
GIS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
BCE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BCE Inc. reported an operating income of 1.28B and revenue of 6.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.
GIS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of 524.60M and revenue of 4.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.
BCE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BCE Inc. reported a net income of 654.69M and revenue of 6.18B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.
GIS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of 303.10M and revenue of 4.44B, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BCE and GIS have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GIS has higher volatility (6.67%) compared to BCE (5.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCE dropped -60.67% vs GIS's -59.63%.
BCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs -1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BCE and GIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer