PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QSR vs. AMLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QSR vs. AMLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSR achieves a 15.11% return, which is significantly lower than AMLP's 19.32% return. Over the past 10 years, QSR has outperformed AMLP with an annualized return of 9.27%, while AMLP has yielded a comparatively lower 6.80% annualized return.


QSR

1D
4.00%
1M
2.05%
6M
12.96%
YTD
15.11%
1Y
17.73%
3Y*
3.44%
5Y*
7.83%
10Y*
9.27%

AMLP

1D
1.41%
1M
5.83%
6M
14.27%
YTD
19.32%
1Y
20.19%
3Y*
19.61%
5Y*
19.03%
10Y*
6.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QSR vs. AMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QSR
Restaurant Brands International Inc.
15.11%8.64%-13.80%24.64%10.72%2.72%-0.34%25.61%-12.15%30.69%
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
19.32%5.78%22.76%21.40%25.47%39.09%-32.26%5.99%-12.67%-7.89%

Correlation

The correlation between QSR and AMLP is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2014

0.27

The correlation between QSR and AMLP shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QSR vs. AMLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSR
QSR Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
QSR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSR Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
QSR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSR Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

AMLP
AMLP Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
AMLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMLP Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
AMLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMLP Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSR vs. AMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QSRAMLPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.28

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

2.27

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.71

6.33

-3.61

QSR vs. AMLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QSR Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the AMLP Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSR and AMLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QSR vs. AMLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSR drawdown since its inception was -63.03%, smaller than the maximum AMLP drawdown of -77.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSR and AMLP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QSRAMLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.03%

-77.19%

+14.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.29%

-8.94%

-4.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.53%

-14.27%

-10.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.27%

-20.92%

-8.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.03%

-72.62%

+9.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.67%

-1.62%

-3.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.02%

-17.31%

+5.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.55%

3.20%

+3.35%

Volatility

QSR vs. AMLP - Volatility Comparison

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) has a higher volatility of 8.54% compared to Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) at 5.08%. This indicates that QSR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QSRAMLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.54%

5.08%

+3.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.58%

9.66%

+8.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.09%

12.59%

+11.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.92%

19.68%

+3.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.55%

27.64%

-0.09%

Dividends

QSR vs. AMLP - Dividend Comparison

QSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than AMLP's 7.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
7.45%8.36%7.70%7.86%7.70%8.55%12.31%9.12%9.29%7.97%8.09%9.84%
QSR
Restaurant Brands International Inc.
3.29%3.63%3.56%2.82%3.34%3.49%3.40%3.14%3.44%1.27%1.30%1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


QSR and AMLP have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QSR has higher volatility (8.54%) compared to AMLP (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSR dropped -63.03% vs AMLP's -77.19%.

AMLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QSR and AMLP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer