QSR vs. AMLP
QSR (Restaurant Brands International Inc.) is a stock, while AMLP (Alerian MLP ETF) is MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. Over the past 10 years, QSR returned 9.27%/yr vs 6.80%/yr for AMLP. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QSR vs. AMLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSR achieves a 15.11% return, which is significantly lower than AMLP's 19.32% return. Over the past 10 years, QSR has outperformed AMLP with an annualized return of 9.27%, while AMLP has yielded a comparatively lower 6.80% annualized return.
QSR
- 1D
- 4.00%
- 1M
- 2.05%
- 6M
- 12.96%
- YTD
- 15.11%
- 1Y
- 17.73%
- 3Y*
- 3.44%
- 5Y*
- 7.83%
- 10Y*
- 9.27%
AMLP
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 5.83%
- 6M
- 14.27%
- YTD
- 19.32%
- 1Y
- 20.19%
- 3Y*
- 19.61%
- 5Y*
- 19.03%
- 10Y*
- 6.80%
QSR vs. AMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSR Restaurant Brands International Inc. | 15.11% | 8.64% | -13.80% | 24.64% | 10.72% | 2.72% | -0.34% | 25.61% | -12.15% | 30.69% |
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 19.32% | 5.78% | 22.76% | 21.40% | 25.47% | 39.09% | -32.26% | 5.99% | -12.67% | -7.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between QSR and AMLP is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2014 | 0.27 |
The correlation between QSR and AMLP shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QSR vs. AMLP — Risk / Return Rank
QSR
AMLP
QSR vs. AMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QSR | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.28 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 2.27 | -0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.71 | 6.33 | -3.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QSR vs. AMLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSR drawdown since its inception was -63.03%, smaller than the maximum AMLP drawdown of -77.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSR and AMLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSR | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.03% | -77.19% | +14.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.29% | -8.94% | -4.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.53% | -14.27% | -10.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.27% | -20.92% | -8.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.03% | -72.62% | +9.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.67% | -1.62% | -3.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.02% | -17.31% | +5.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.55% | 3.20% | +3.35% |
Volatility
QSR vs. AMLP - Volatility Comparison
Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) has a higher volatility of 8.54% compared to Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) at 5.08%. This indicates that QSR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QSR | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.54% | 5.08% | +3.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.58% | 9.66% | +8.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.09% | 12.59% | +11.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.92% | 19.68% | +3.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.55% | 27.64% | -0.09% |
Dividends
QSR vs. AMLP - Dividend Comparison
QSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than AMLP's 7.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 7.45% | 8.36% | 7.70% | 7.86% | 7.70% | 8.55% | 12.31% | 9.12% | 9.29% | 7.97% | 8.09% | 9.84% |
QSR Restaurant Brands International Inc. | 3.29% | 3.63% | 3.56% | 2.82% | 3.34% | 3.49% | 3.40% | 3.14% | 3.44% | 1.27% | 1.30% | 1.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QSR and AMLP have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QSR has higher volatility (8.54%) compared to AMLP (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSR dropped -63.03% vs AMLP's -77.19%.
AMLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QSR and AMLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer