PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QSR.TO vs. CTC-A.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

QSR.TO vs. CTC-A.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR.TO) and Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd (CTC-A.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSR.TO achieves a 8.89% return, which is significantly higher than CTC-A.TO's 3.27% return. Over the past 10 years, QSR.TO has outperformed CTC-A.TO with an annualized return of 9.79%, while CTC-A.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 5.42% annualized return.


QSR.TO

1D
2.08%
1M
-7.18%
YTD
8.89%
6M
2.51%
1Y
6.54%
3Y*
2.94%
5Y*
7.57%
10Y*
9.79%

CTC-A.TO

1D
-0.02%
1M
-5.22%
YTD
3.27%
6M
4.58%
1Y
6.27%
3Y*
6.15%
5Y*
1.32%
10Y*
5.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QSR.TO vs. CTC-A.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QSR.TO
Restaurant Brands International Inc.
8.89%3.75%-6.49%21.97%18.60%1.95%-2.22%19.57%-4.88%22.41%
CTC-A.TO
Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd
3.27%20.07%12.82%3.76%-19.20%11.26%24.14%0.73%-11.01%19.72%

Correlation

The correlation between QSR.TO and CTC-A.TO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2014

0.30

Fundamentals

Market Cap

QSR.TO:

CA$46.40B

CTC-A.TO:

CA$9.32B

EPS

QSR.TO:

CA$2.09

CTC-A.TO:

CA$11.14

PE Ratio

QSR.TO:

48.45

CTC-A.TO:

15.80

PS Ratio

QSR.TO:

4.82

CTC-A.TO:

0.58

PB Ratio

QSR.TO:

12.43

CTC-A.TO:

1.60

Total Revenue (TTM)

QSR.TO:

CA$9.58B

CTC-A.TO:

CA$16.43B

Gross Profit (TTM)

QSR.TO:

CA$3.93B

CTC-A.TO:

CA$5.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

QSR.TO:

CA$2.58B

CTC-A.TO:

CA$2.09B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QSR.TO vs. CTC-A.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSR.TO
QSR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
QSR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
QSR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

CTC-A.TO
CTC-A.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
CTC-A.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTC-A.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTC-A.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
CTC-A.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTC-A.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSR.TO vs. CTC-A.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR.TO) and Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd (CTC-A.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QSR.TOCTC-A.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.08

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.56

0.39

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.18

0.75

+0.42

QSR.TO vs. CTC-A.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QSR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is comparable to the CTC-A.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSR.TO and CTC-A.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QSR.TOCTC-A.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

0.29

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.06

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.21

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.22

+0.22

Drawdowns

QSR.TO vs. CTC-A.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSR.TO drawdown since its inception was -60.02%, smaller than the maximum CTC-A.TO drawdown of -87.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSR.TO and CTC-A.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QSR.TOCTC-A.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.02%

-87.25%

+27.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.80%

-16.35%

+4.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.00%

-29.70%

+9.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.71%

-30.90%

+4.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.02%

-58.17%

-1.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.13%

-11.43%

+2.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.82%

-33.68%

+21.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.75%

8.33%

-2.58%

Volatility

QSR.TO vs. CTC-A.TO - Volatility Comparison

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.58% compared to Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd (CTC-A.TO) at 7.66%. This indicates that QSR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTC-A.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QSR.TOCTC-A.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.58%

7.66%

+0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.56%

14.54%

+3.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.31%

21.70%

+1.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.53%

22.05%

-0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.31%

25.87%

+0.44%

Dividends

QSR.TO vs. CTC-A.TO - Dividend Comparison

QSR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, less than CTC-A.TO's 4.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CTC-A.TO
Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd
4.06%4.08%4.63%4.90%4.13%2.59%2.72%2.97%2.52%1.59%1.65%1.78%
QSR.TO
Restaurant Brands International Inc.
3.42%3.68%3.42%2.85%3.24%3.49%3.57%3.20%3.09%1.31%1.28%1.10%

Financials

QSR.TO vs. CTC-A.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Restaurant Brands International Inc. and Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
2.26B
3.57B
(QSR.TO) Total Revenue
(CTC-A.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

QSR.TO vs. CTC-A.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Restaurant Brands International Inc. and Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
48.8%
34.0%
Portfolio components
QSR.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.10B and revenue of 2.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.8%.

CTC-A.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd reported a gross profit of 1.21B and revenue of 3.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.0%.

QSR.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported an operating income of 581.50M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.8%.

CTC-A.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd reported an operating income of 254.30M and revenue of 3.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.

QSR.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a net income of 337.13M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.

CTC-A.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd reported a net income of 107.00M and revenue of 3.57B, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


QSR.TO and CTC-A.TO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QSR.TO and CTC-A.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer