CTC-A.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd (CTC-A.TO) and CT Real Estate Investment Trust (CRT-UN.TO).
Performance
CTC-A.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CTC-A.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTC-A.TO Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd | 9.69% | 20.07% | 12.82% | 3.76% | -19.20% | 11.26% | 24.14% | 0.73% | -11.01% | 19.72% |
CRT-UN.TO CT Real Estate Investment Trust | 5.80% | 20.98% | 3.91% | -0.26% | -5.16% | 16.13% | 2.73% | 47.58% | -15.83% | 1.42% |
Fundamentals
CTC-A.TO:
CA$10.07B
CRT-UN.TO:
CA$2.83B
CTC-A.TO:
CA$9.79
CRT-UN.TO:
CA$1.52
CTC-A.TO:
19.28
CRT-UN.TO:
11.18
CTC-A.TO:
0.38
CRT-UN.TO:
0.21
CTC-A.TO:
0.63
CRT-UN.TO:
6.50
CTC-A.TO:
1.72
CRT-UN.TO:
1.43
CTC-A.TO:
CA$16.32B
CRT-UN.TO:
CA$604.25M
CTC-A.TO:
CA$5.38B
CRT-UN.TO:
CA$471.69M
CTC-A.TO:
CA$1.99B
CRT-UN.TO:
CA$612.14M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTC-A.TO achieves a 9.69% return, which is significantly higher than CRT-UN.TO's 5.80% return. Over the past 10 years, CTC-A.TO has underperformed CRT-UN.TO with an annualized return of 6.77%, while CRT-UN.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 7.36% annualized return.
CTC-A.TO
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -2.08%
- YTD
- 9.69%
- 6M
- 15.36%
- 1Y
- 31.05%
- 3Y*
- 6.96%
- 5Y*
- 4.82%
- 10Y*
- 6.77%
CRT-UN.TO
- 1D
- 2.60%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- YTD
- 5.80%
- 6M
- 7.09%
- 1Y
- 21.20%
- 3Y*
- 8.38%
- 5Y*
- 6.91%
- 10Y*
- 7.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTC-A.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CTC-A.TO
CRT-UN.TO
CTC-A.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd (CTC-A.TO) and CT Real Estate Investment Trust (CRT-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CTC-A.TO | CRT-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.48 | 1.49 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.95 | 2.21 | -0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.26 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 3.86 | -1.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.10 | 9.76 | -5.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CTC-A.TO | CRT-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 1.49 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.39 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.36 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.52 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between CTC-A.TO and CRT-UN.TO is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CTC-A.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison
CTC-A.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, less than CRT-UN.TO's 5.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTC-A.TO Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd | 3.77% | 4.08% | 4.63% | 4.90% | 4.13% | 2.59% | 2.72% | 2.97% | 2.52% | 1.59% | 1.65% | 1.78% |
CRT-UN.TO CT Real Estate Investment Trust | 5.56% | 5.77% | 6.40% | 6.04% | 5.48% | 4.76% | 5.09% | 4.70% | 6.37% | 4.82% | 4.57% | 5.09% |
Drawdowns
CTC-A.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTC-A.TO drawdown since its inception was -87.25%, which is greater than CRT-UN.TO's maximum drawdown of -45.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTC-A.TO and CRT-UN.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTC-A.TO | CRT-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.25% | -45.88% | -41.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.35% | -6.24% | -10.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.48% | -24.70% | -8.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.17% | -45.88% | -12.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.93% | -1.55% | -2.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.78% | -6.34% | -27.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.77% | 2.46% | +5.31% |
Volatility
CTC-A.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison
Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd (CTC-A.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.16% compared to CT Real Estate Investment Trust (CRT-UN.TO) at 5.49%. This indicates that CTC-A.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRT-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CTC-A.TO | CRT-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.16% | 5.49% | +1.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.13% | 9.77% | +4.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.07% | 14.44% | +6.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.32% | 17.62% | +4.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.84% | 20.30% | +5.54% |
Financials
CTC-A.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd and CT Real Estate Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CTC-A.TO vs. CRT-UN.TO - Profitability Comparison
CTC-A.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd reported a gross profit of 1.51B and revenue of 4.55B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.2%.
CRT-UN.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CT Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 119.44M and revenue of 152.92M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.1%.
CTC-A.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd reported an operating income of 445.00M and revenue of 4.55B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.8%.
CRT-UN.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CT Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 115.18M and revenue of 152.92M, resulting in an operating margin of 75.3%.
CTC-A.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd reported a net income of 211.00M and revenue of 4.55B, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.
CRT-UN.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CT Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of 88.39M and revenue of 152.92M, resulting in a net margin of 57.8%.