QSR.TO vs. SBUX
Compare and contrast key facts about Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR.TO) and Starbucks Corporation (SBUX).
Performance
QSR.TO vs. SBUX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QSR.TO vs. SBUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSR.TO Restaurant Brands International Inc. | 12.36% | 3.75% | -6.49% | 21.97% | 18.60% | 1.95% | -2.22% | 19.57% | -4.88% | 22.41% |
SBUX Starbucks Corporation | 9.45% | -9.61% | 5.90% | -3.36% | -6.99% | 10.14% | 22.09% | 32.25% | 24.47% | -1.35% |
Different Trading Currencies
QSR.TO is traded in CAD, while SBUX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SBUX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
QSR.TO:
CA$47.67B
SBUX:
$103.26B
QSR.TO:
CA$1.70
SBUX:
$1.20
QSR.TO:
61.39
SBUX:
75.37
QSR.TO:
5.05
SBUX:
2.74
QSR.TO:
CA$9.43B
SBUX:
$37.70B
QSR.TO:
CA$3.88B
SBUX:
$12.86B
QSR.TO:
CA$2.34B
SBUX:
$4.91B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSR.TO achieves a 12.36% return, which is significantly higher than SBUX's 9.45% return. Over the past 10 years, QSR.TO has outperformed SBUX with an annualized return of 10.71%, while SBUX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.93% annualized return.
QSR.TO
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- 6.95%
- YTD
- 12.36%
- 6M
- 15.20%
- 1Y
- 12.60%
- 3Y*
- 8.35%
- 5Y*
- 8.59%
- 10Y*
- 10.71%
SBUX
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -5.02%
- YTD
- 9.45%
- 6M
- 8.31%
- 1Y
- -8.09%
- 3Y*
- -1.30%
- 5Y*
- 0.54%
- 10Y*
- 6.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QSR.TO vs. SBUX — Risk / Return Rank
QSR.TO
SBUX
QSR.TO vs. SBUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR.TO) and Starbucks Corporation (SBUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QSR.TO | SBUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.55 | -0.24 | +0.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.90 | -0.11 | +1.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.99 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | -0.39 | +1.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.03 | -0.64 | +2.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QSR.TO | SBUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | -0.24 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.02 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.25 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.75 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between QSR.TO and SBUX is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
QSR.TO vs. SBUX - Dividend Comparison
QSR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, more than SBUX's 2.72% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSR.TO Restaurant Brands International Inc. | 3.31% | 3.68% | 3.42% | 2.85% | 3.24% | 3.49% | 3.57% | 3.20% | 3.09% | 1.31% | 1.28% | 1.10% |
SBUX Starbucks Corporation | 2.72% | 2.91% | 2.54% | 2.25% | 2.02% | 1.57% | 1.57% | 1.69% | 2.05% | 1.83% | 1.53% | 1.13% |
Drawdowns
QSR.TO vs. SBUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSR.TO drawdown since its inception was -60.02%, which is greater than SBUX's maximum drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSR.TO and SBUX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSR.TO | SBUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.02% | -81.91% | +21.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.99% | -19.99% | +7.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.28% | -43.68% | +16.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.02% | -43.68% | -16.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -19.86% | +19.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.94% | -16.28% | +4.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.32% | 11.29% | -4.97% |
Volatility
QSR.TO vs. SBUX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR.TO) is 6.96%, while Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) has a volatility of 10.15%. This indicates that QSR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QSR.TO | SBUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.96% | 10.15% | -3.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.23% | 21.29% | -4.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.15% | 34.12% | -10.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.21% | 30.14% | -8.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.28% | 28.27% | -1.99% |
Financials
QSR.TO vs. SBUX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Restaurant Brands International Inc. and Starbucks Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
QSR.TO vs. SBUX - Profitability Comparison
QSR.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.17B and revenue of 2.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.5%.
SBUX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Starbucks Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.64B and revenue of 9.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.0%.
QSR.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported an operating income of 647.00M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.2%.
SBUX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Starbucks Corporation reported an operating income of 890.80M and revenue of 9.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.0%.
QSR.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Restaurant Brands International Inc. reported a net income of 113.00M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.
SBUX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Starbucks Corporation reported a net income of 293.30M and revenue of 9.92B, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.