CTC-A.TO vs. L.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd (CTC-A.TO) and Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO).
Performance
CTC-A.TO vs. L.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CTC-A.TO vs. L.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTC-A.TO Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd | 9.69% | 20.07% | 12.82% | 3.76% | -19.20% | 11.26% | 24.14% | 0.73% | -11.01% | 19.72% |
L.TO Loblaw Companies Limited | 3.44% | 32.54% | 50.14% | 9.65% | 18.16% | 70.07% | -3.01% | 13.23% | 14.59% | -2.20% |
Fundamentals
CTC-A.TO:
CA$10.07B
L.TO:
CA$76.08B
CTC-A.TO:
CA$9.79
L.TO:
CA$4.47
CTC-A.TO:
19.28
L.TO:
14.33
CTC-A.TO:
0.63
L.TO:
0.60
CTC-A.TO:
1.72
L.TO:
6.90
CTC-A.TO:
CA$16.32B
L.TO:
CA$63.90B
CTC-A.TO:
CA$5.38B
L.TO:
CA$19.99B
CTC-A.TO:
CA$1.99B
L.TO:
CA$7.20B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTC-A.TO achieves a 9.69% return, which is significantly higher than L.TO's 3.44% return. Over the past 10 years, CTC-A.TO has underperformed L.TO with an annualized return of 6.77%, while L.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 18.62% annualized return.
CTC-A.TO
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -2.08%
- YTD
- 9.69%
- 6M
- 15.36%
- 1Y
- 31.05%
- 3Y*
- 6.96%
- 5Y*
- 4.82%
- 10Y*
- 6.77%
L.TO
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 3.44%
- 6M
- 19.09%
- 1Y
- 27.12%
- 3Y*
- 29.69%
- 5Y*
- 32.03%
- 10Y*
- 18.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTC-A.TO vs. L.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CTC-A.TO
L.TO
CTC-A.TO vs. L.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd (CTC-A.TO) and Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CTC-A.TO | L.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.48 | 1.31 | +0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.95 | 1.84 | +0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.23 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 2.66 | -0.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.10 | 6.01 | -1.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CTC-A.TO | L.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 1.31 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 1.74 | -1.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 1.01 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.69 | -0.47 |
Correlation
The correlation between CTC-A.TO and L.TO is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CTC-A.TO vs. L.TO - Dividend Comparison
CTC-A.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than L.TO's 0.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTC-A.TO Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd | 3.77% | 4.08% | 4.63% | 4.90% | 4.13% | 2.59% | 2.72% | 2.97% | 2.52% | 1.59% | 1.65% | 1.78% |
L.TO Loblaw Companies Limited | 0.88% | 0.89% | 1.58% | 2.14% | 2.16% | 2.32% | 3.63% | 3.34% | 2.51% | 1.57% | 1.46% | 1.52% |
Drawdowns
CTC-A.TO vs. L.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTC-A.TO drawdown since its inception was -87.25%, which is greater than L.TO's maximum drawdown of -63.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTC-A.TO and L.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTC-A.TO | L.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.25% | -63.24% | -24.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.35% | -10.64% | -5.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.48% | -13.81% | -19.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.17% | -20.23% | -37.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.93% | -7.33% | +3.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.78% | -14.87% | -18.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.77% | 4.70% | +3.07% |
Volatility
CTC-A.TO vs. L.TO - Volatility Comparison
Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd (CTC-A.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.16% compared to Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) at 5.72%. This indicates that CTC-A.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than L.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CTC-A.TO | L.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.16% | 5.72% | +1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.13% | 15.63% | -1.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.07% | 20.75% | +0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.32% | 18.47% | +3.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.84% | 18.62% | +7.22% |
Financials
CTC-A.TO vs. L.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd and Loblaw Companies Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CTC-A.TO vs. L.TO - Profitability Comparison
CTC-A.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd reported a gross profit of 1.51B and revenue of 4.55B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.2%.
L.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Loblaw Companies Limited reported a gross profit of 4.32B and revenue of 15.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.5%.
CTC-A.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd reported an operating income of 445.00M and revenue of 4.55B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.8%.
L.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Loblaw Companies Limited reported an operating income of 929.00M and revenue of 15.70B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.
CTC-A.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd reported a net income of 211.00M and revenue of 4.55B, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.
L.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Loblaw Companies Limited reported a net income of 656.00M and revenue of 15.70B, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.