QSR.TO vs. ATD.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR.TO) and Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QSR.TO or ATD.TO.
Key characteristics
| QSR.TO | ATD.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -7.64% | -0.37% |
| 1Y Return | 1.59% | -1.12% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 12.32% | 16.36% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 3.76% | 14.56% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.07 | -0.04 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.25 | 0.09 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.03 | 1.01 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.08 | -0.01 |
| Martin Ratio | 0.14 | -0.11 |
| Ulcer Index | 9.95% | 8.72% |
| Daily Std Dev | 20.63% | 21.39% |
| Max Drawdown | -60.30% | -100.00% |
| Current Drawdown | -14.24% | -99.99% |
Fundamentals
| QSR.TO | ATD.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | CA$42.60B | CA$73.36B |
| EPS | CA$5.52 | CA$3.92 |
| PE Ratio | 17.02 | 19.74 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | CA$7.93B | CA$55.49B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$2.95B | CA$9.40B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | CA$1.90B | CA$2.65B |
Correlation
The correlation between QSR.TO and ATD.TO is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
QSR.TO vs. ATD.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, QSR.TO achieves a -7.64% return, which is significantly lower than ATD.TO's -0.37% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QSR.TO vs. ATD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR.TO) and Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QSR.TO vs. ATD.TO - Dividend Comparison
QSR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, more than ATD.TO's 0.68% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSR.TO Restaurant Brands International Inc. | 2.44% | 2.12% | 2.47% | 2.76% | 2.67% | 2.26% | 2.52% | 1.01% | 0.97% | 0.85% | 0.00% |
ATD.TO Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. | 0.68% | 0.76% | 0.79% | 0.70% | 0.68% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
QSR.TO vs. ATD.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSR.TO drawdown since its inception was -60.30%, smaller than the maximum ATD.TO drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSR.TO and ATD.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QSR.TO vs. ATD.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR.TO) is 6.18%, while Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO) has a volatility of 7.08%. This indicates that QSR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
QSR.TO vs. ATD.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Restaurant Brands International Inc. and Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities