QSPT vs. QFLR

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QSPT (FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – September) and QFLR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QSPT returned 20.91% vs 26.58% for QFLR. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QSPT charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for QFLR.

Performance

QSPT vs. QFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – September (QSPT) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSPT achieves a 9.68% return, which is significantly higher than QFLR's 6.83% return.

QSPT

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 2.86%
• YTD: 9.68%
• 6M: 9.71%
• 1Y: 20.91%
• 3Y*: 18.73%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QFLR

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 3.24%
• YTD: 6.83%
• 6M: 5.81%
• 1Y: 26.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QSPT vs. QFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QSPT FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – September	9.68%	14.58%	13.82%
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	6.83%	17.27%	16.64%

Correlation

The correlation between QSPT and QFLR is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2024	0.88

The correlation between QSPT and QFLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

QSPT vs. QFLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QSPT	QFLR
Technology	53.8%	50.8%
Communication Services	16.1%	18.4%
Consumer Cyclical	13.3%	12.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	9.2%
Healthcare	4.5%	3.2%
Industrials	3.7%	2.8%
Utilities	1.4%	1.5%
Basic Materials	1.3%	0.0%
Energy	0.5%	1.1%
Financial Services	0.4%	0.9%
Real Estate	0.2%	-

Return for Risk

QSPT vs. QFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSPT

QSPT Risk / Return Rank: 68
QSPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
QSPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
QSPT Omega Ratio Rank: 73
QSPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
QSPT Martin Ratio Rank: 70

QFLR

QFLR Risk / Return Rank: 74
QFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
QFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
QFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 75
QFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
QFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSPT vs. QFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – September (QSPT) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QSPT	QFLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	2.37	-0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.07	3.22	-0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.44	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.91	3.51	-0.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.00	14.97	-1.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QSPT vs. QFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QSPT Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the QFLR Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSPT and QFLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QSPT	QFLR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.21	2.37	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	1.39	-0.57

Drawdowns

QSPT vs. QFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSPT drawdown since its inception was -22.64%, which is greater than QFLR's maximum drawdown of -13.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSPT and QFLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	QSPT	QFLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.64%	-13.97%	-8.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.23%	-7.61%	+0.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.54%	+0.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.61%	-2.49%	-2.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.61%	1.78%	-0.17%

Volatility

QSPT vs. QFLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – September (QSPT) is 1.21%, while Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) has a volatility of 2.50%. This indicates that QSPT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QSPT	QFLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.21%	2.50%	-1.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.53%	8.04%	-0.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.51%	11.27%	-1.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.14%	12.61%	+2.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.14%	12.61%	+2.53%

QSPT vs. QFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

QSPT has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than QFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

QSPT vs. QFLR - Dividend Comparison

Neither QSPT nor QFLR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	0.00%	0.02%	0.03%
QSPT FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – September	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QSPT and QFLR in my portfolio?

QSPT and QFLR have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QSPT or QFLR?

QFLR has higher volatility (2.50%) compared to QSPT (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSPT dropped -22.64% vs QFLR's -13.97%.

Which ETF is better, QSPT or QFLR?

On 1-year performance, QFLR leads with 26.58% vs 20.91% for QSPT. On fees, QFLR is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, QSPT has been the lower-risk option at 1.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QSPT or QFLR?

Over the 1-year period, QFLR has performed better with a 26.58% return vs 20.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QSPT or QFLR?

QFLR is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QSPT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QSPT or QFLR?

QSPT and QFLR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between QSPT and QFLR?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for QSPT and 0.89% for QFLR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QFLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.