QSOL vs. SPMO
QSOL (Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QSOL is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QSOL charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
QSOL vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSOL achieves a -43.81% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 29.91% return.
QSOL
- 1D
- -5.21%
- 1M
- -18.27%
- YTD
- -43.81%
- 6M
- -44.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO
- 1D
- -4.53%
- 1M
- 6.65%
- YTD
- 29.91%
- 6M
- 28.13%
- 1Y
- 43.55%
- 3Y*
- 42.47%
- 5Y*
- 22.89%
- 10Y*
- 21.03%
QSOL vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | -43.81% | -4.28% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 29.91% | 0.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between QSOL and SPMO is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QSOL vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
QSOL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPMO
QSOL vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF (QSOL) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QSOL | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.39 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.45 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.97 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QSOL vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSOL drawdown since its inception was -56.55%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSOL and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSOL | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.55% | -30.95% | -25.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.76% | -4.53% | -48.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.92% | -4.59% | -29.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.37% | — |
Volatility
QSOL vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QSOL | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.75% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.31% | 20.55% | +51.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.31% | 19.88% | +52.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.31% | 20.60% | +51.71% |
QSOL vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QSOL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QSOL vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
QSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than SPMO's 0.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.68% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QSOL and SPMO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QSOL.
QSOL has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.68% for SPMO.
QSOL is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SPMO is Momentum. QSOL tracks Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QSOL and 0.13% for SPMO.
Find the right allocation for QSOL and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer