QSOL vs. QQQM
QSOL (Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QSOL is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QSOL charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.
Performance
QSOL vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSOL achieves a -38.08% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 15.22% return.
QSOL
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- 6M
- -45.69%
- YTD
- -38.08%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQM
- 1D
- -1.65%
- 1M
- -3.18%
- 6M
- 13.83%
- YTD
- 15.22%
- 1Y
- 27.34%
- 3Y*
- 23.46%
- 5Y*
- 15.34%
- 10Y*
- —
QSOL vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | -38.08% | -4.28% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 15.22% | 0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between QSOL and QQQM is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QSOL vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
QSOL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QQQM
QSOL vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF (QSOL) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QSOL | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.30 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.14 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QSOL vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSOL drawdown since its inception was -56.55%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSOL and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSOL | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.55% | -35.04% | -21.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.94% | -5.28% | -42.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.45% | -8.15% | -27.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.37% | — |
Volatility
QSOL vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QSOL | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.34% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.51% | 18.54% | +52.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.51% | 22.65% | +48.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.51% | 22.30% | +49.21% |
QSOL vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
QSOL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QSOL vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
QSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, more than QQQM's 0.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.45% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% |
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | 0.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QSOL and QQQM have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QSOL.
QSOL has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.45% for QQQM.
QSOL is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. QSOL tracks Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QSOL and 0.15% for QQQM.
Find the right allocation for QSOL and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer