PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QSOL vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QSOL vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF (QSOL) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSOL achieves a -38.08% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 15.22% return.


QSOL

1D
-1.86%
1M
3.11%
6M
-45.69%
YTD
-38.08%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQM

1D
-1.65%
1M
-3.18%
6M
13.83%
YTD
15.22%
1Y
27.34%
3Y*
23.46%
5Y*
15.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QSOL vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QSOL
Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF
-38.08%-4.28%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
15.22%0.27%

Correlation

The correlation between QSOL and QQQM is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QSOL vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSOL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSOL vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF (QSOL) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QSOLQQQMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.14

QSOL vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QSOL vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSOL drawdown since its inception was -56.55%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSOL and QQQM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QSOLQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.55%

-35.04%

-21.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.94%

-5.28%

-42.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.45%

-8.15%

-27.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

Volatility

QSOL vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QSOLQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.51%

18.54%

+52.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

71.51%

22.65%

+48.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

71.51%

22.30%

+49.21%

QSOL vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

QSOL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QSOL vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

QSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, more than QQQM's 0.45% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.45%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%
QSOL
Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF
0.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QSOL and QQQM have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QSOL.

QSOL has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.45% for QQQM.

QSOL is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. QSOL tracks Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QSOL and 0.15% for QQQM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QSOL and QQQM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer