QSOL vs. IDMO
QSOL (Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF) and IDMO (Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QSOL is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return, while IDMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
QSOL vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSOL achieves a -38.08% return, which is significantly lower than IDMO's 8.27% return.
QSOL
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- 6M
- -45.69%
- YTD
- -38.08%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IDMO
- 1D
- -1.59%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- 6M
- 5.42%
- YTD
- 8.27%
- 1Y
- 21.68%
- 3Y*
- 24.84%
- 5Y*
- 15.50%
- 10Y*
- 12.47%
QSOL vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | -38.08% | -4.28% |
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 8.27% | 1.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between QSOL and IDMO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QSOL vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank
QSOL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IDMO
QSOL vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF (QSOL) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QSOL | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.77 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.94 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QSOL vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSOL drawdown since its inception was -56.55%, which is greater than IDMO's maximum drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSOL and IDMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSOL | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.55% | -39.38% | -17.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.94% | -3.93% | -44.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.45% | -9.70% | -25.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.13% | — |
Volatility
QSOL vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QSOL | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.93% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.86% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.51% | 18.53% | +52.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.51% | 18.14% | +53.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.51% | 17.89% | +53.62% |
QSOL vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QSOL and IDMO have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QSOL vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison
QSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than IDMO's 3.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 3.69% | 3.71% | 2.24% | 2.89% | 3.66% | 1.81% | 1.63% | 2.78% | 3.27% | 3.08% | 2.18% | 2.52% |
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | 0.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QSOL and IDMO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QSOL and IDMO have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 0.90% for QSOL.
QSOL is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while IDMO is Momentum. QSOL tracks Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return, while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index.
Find the right allocation for QSOL and IDMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer