QSOL vs. GFOF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QSOL (Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF) and GFOF (Grayscale Future of Finance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QSOL is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return, while GFOF is a Blockchain fund tracking the Bloomberg Grayscale Future of Finance Index. Both are passively managed. QSOL charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for GFOF.

Performance

QSOL vs. GFOF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF (QSOL) and Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QSOL

• 1D: -4.67%
• 1M: -14.50%
• YTD: -41.51%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GFOF

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QSOL vs. GFOF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF	-41.51%	-0.92%
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Return for Risk

QSOL vs. GFOF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF (QSOL) and Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QSOL	GFOF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.99	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	QSOL	GFOF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.82%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.98%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QSOL	GFOF	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.59%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.59%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.59%	—	—

QSOL vs. GFOF - Expense Ratio Comparison

QSOL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than GFOF's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

QSOL vs. GFOF - Dividend Comparison

QSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, while GFOF has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF	0.00%	0.00%	2.55%	4.08%
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF	0.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, QSOL or GFOF?

On fees, QSOL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QSOL or GFOF?

QSOL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GFOF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QSOL or GFOF?

QSOL has the higher dividend yield at 0.20%, compared with 0.00% for GFOF.

What is the main difference between QSOL and GFOF?

QSOL is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while GFOF is Blockchain. QSOL tracks Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return, while GFOF tracks Bloomberg Grayscale Future of Finance Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QSOL and 0.70% for GFOF.