PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QRMI vs. SHLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QRMI vs. SHLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRMI achieves a 2.60% return, which is significantly higher than SHLD's -2.28% return.


QRMI

1D
0.20%
1M
1.85%
YTD
2.60%
6M
3.95%
1Y
9.73%
3Y*
7.02%
5Y*
10Y*

SHLD

1D
-2.39%
1M
-7.01%
YTD
-2.28%
6M
1.71%
1Y
9.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QRMI vs. SHLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
QRMI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
2.60%3.76%14.72%1.05%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
-2.28%74.16%35.03%12.89%

Correlation

The correlation between QRMI and SHLD is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023

0.30

QRMI vs. SHLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QRMI
SHLD

Technology

53.8%
11.8%

Communication Services

15.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.7%

-

Healthcare

4.2%

-

Industrials

2.8%
88.2%

Utilities

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

1.1%

-

Energy

0.6%

-

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

QRMI
53.8%
SHLD
11.8%

Communication Services

QRMI
15.8%
SHLD

-

Consumer Cyclical

QRMI
12.2%
SHLD

-

Consumer Defensive

QRMI
7.7%
SHLD

-

Healthcare

QRMI
4.2%
SHLD

-

Industrials

QRMI
2.8%
SHLD
88.2%

Utilities

QRMI
1.4%
SHLD

-

Basic Materials

QRMI
1.1%
SHLD

-

Energy

QRMI
0.6%
SHLD

-

Financial Services

QRMI
0.2%
SHLD

-

Real Estate

QRMI
0.1%
SHLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QRMI vs. SHLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRMI
QRMI Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
QRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
QRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
QRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
QRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

SHLD
SHLD Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
SHLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHLD Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
SHLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHLD Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QRMI vs. SHLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QRMISHLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.08

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

0.49

+1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.52

1.30

+7.22

QRMI vs. SHLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QRMI Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the SHLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRMI and SHLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QRMISHLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

0.41

+1.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

2.00

-1.78

Drawdowns

QRMI vs. SHLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRMI drawdown since its inception was -20.95%, roughly equal to the maximum SHLD drawdown of -20.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRMI and SHLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QRMISHLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.95%

-20.10%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.04%

-20.10%

+15.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-18.85%

+18.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.98%

-3.19%

-4.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.14%

7.51%

-6.37%

Volatility

QRMI vs. SHLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) is 0.66%, while Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) has a volatility of 7.81%. This indicates that QRMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QRMISHLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.66%

7.81%

-7.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.43%

19.35%

-14.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.76%

24.05%

-18.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.34%

21.13%

-12.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.34%

21.13%

-12.79%

QRMI vs. SHLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

QRMI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SHLD's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

QRMI vs. SHLD - Dividend Comparison

QRMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.19%, more than SHLD's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
QRMI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
12.19%12.28%11.80%12.44%10.65%3.36%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
0.56%0.55%0.53%0.26%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QRMI and SHLD have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHLD has higher volatility (7.81%) compared to QRMI (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QRMI dropped -20.95% vs SHLD's -20.10%.

On 1-year performance, QRMI leads with 9.73% vs 9.71% for SHLD. On fees, SHLD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, QRMI has been the lower-risk option at 0.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QRMI has performed better with a 9.73% return vs 9.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHLD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QRMI.

QRMI has the higher dividend yield at 12.19%, compared with 0.56% for SHLD.

QRMI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SHLD is Aerospace & Defense. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QRMI and 0.50% for SHLD.

QRMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QRMI and SHLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer