PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QRMI vs. SHLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QRMI vs. SHLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRMI achieves a 2.36% return, which is significantly higher than SHLD's -10.17% return.


QRMI

1D
0.21%
1M
0.32%
YTD
2.36%
6M
2.14%
1Y
9.04%
3Y*
7.54%
5Y*
10Y*

SHLD

1D
-1.15%
1M
-11.99%
YTD
-10.17%
6M
-12.31%
1Y
-0.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QRMI vs. SHLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
QRMI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
2.36%3.76%14.72%1.08%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
-10.17%74.16%35.03%12.89%

Correlation

The correlation between QRMI and SHLD is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2023

0.29

QRMI vs. SHLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QRMI
SHLD

Technology

62.0%
12.2%

Communication Services

13.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.4%

-

Healthcare

3.5%

-

Industrials

3.5%
87.8%

Utilities

1.2%

-

Basic Materials

1.0%

-

Energy

0.5%

-

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

QRMI
62.0%
SHLD
12.2%

Communication Services

QRMI
13.3%
SHLD

-

Consumer Cyclical

QRMI
10.4%
SHLD

-

Consumer Defensive

QRMI
6.4%
SHLD

-

Healthcare

QRMI
3.5%
SHLD

-

Industrials

QRMI
3.5%
SHLD
87.8%

Utilities

QRMI
1.2%
SHLD

-

Basic Materials

QRMI
1.0%
SHLD

-

Energy

QRMI
0.5%
SHLD

-

Financial Services

QRMI
0.2%
SHLD

-

Real Estate

QRMI
0.1%
SHLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QRMI vs. SHLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRMI
QRMI Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
QRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
QRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
QRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
QRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

SHLD
SHLD Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SHLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHLD Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
SHLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHLD Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QRMI vs. SHLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QRMISHLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.02

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

-0.01

+1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.83

-0.03

+7.86

QRMI vs. SHLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QRMI Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the SHLD Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRMI and SHLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QRMI vs. SHLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRMI drawdown since its inception was -20.95%, smaller than the maximum SHLD drawdown of -25.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRMI and SHLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QRMISHLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.95%

-25.40%

+4.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.04%

-25.40%

+20.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-25.40%

+24.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.89%

-3.55%

-4.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.16%

8.97%

-7.81%

Volatility

QRMI vs. SHLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) is 2.24%, while Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) has a volatility of 9.01%. This indicates that QRMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QRMISHLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.24%

9.01%

-6.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.86%

20.22%

-15.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.96%

24.85%

-18.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.34%

21.39%

-13.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.34%

21.39%

-13.05%

QRMI vs. SHLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

QRMI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SHLD's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

QRMI vs. SHLD - Dividend Comparison

QRMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.34%, more than SHLD's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
QRMI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
12.34%12.28%11.80%12.44%10.65%3.36%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
0.61%0.55%0.53%0.26%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QRMI and SHLD have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHLD has higher volatility (9.01%) compared to QRMI (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QRMI dropped -20.95% vs SHLD's -25.40%.

On 1-year performance, QRMI leads with 9.04% vs -0.23% for SHLD. On fees, SHLD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, QRMI has been the lower-risk option at 2.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QRMI has performed better with a 9.04% return vs -0.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHLD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QRMI.

QRMI has the higher dividend yield at 12.34%, compared with 0.61% for SHLD.

QRMI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SHLD is Aerospace & Defense. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QRMI and 0.50% for SHLD.

QRMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QRMI and SHLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer