PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QRMI vs. SHLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QRMI vs. SHLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRMI achieves a 0.70% return, which is significantly higher than SHLD's -7.27% return.


QRMI

1D
-1.52%
1M
-2.06%
6M
-0.36%
YTD
0.70%
1Y
6.74%
3Y*
5.96%
5Y*
10Y*

SHLD

1D
-0.61%
1M
-5.92%
6M
-22.32%
YTD
-7.27%
1Y
-0.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QRMI vs. SHLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
QRMI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
0.70%3.76%14.72%1.08%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
-7.27%74.16%35.03%12.89%

Correlation

The correlation between QRMI and SHLD is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2023

0.29

QRMI vs. SHLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QRMI
SHLD

Technology

59.0%
12.2%

Communication Services

12.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.5%

-

Healthcare

3.8%

-

Industrials

3.7%
87.8%

Utilities

1.2%

-

Basic Materials

1.1%

-

Energy

0.5%

-

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

QRMI
59.0%
SHLD
12.2%

Communication Services

QRMI
12.8%
SHLD

-

Consumer Cyclical

QRMI
10.5%
SHLD

-

Consumer Defensive

QRMI
6.5%
SHLD

-

Healthcare

QRMI
3.8%
SHLD

-

Industrials

QRMI
3.7%
SHLD
87.8%

Utilities

QRMI
1.2%
SHLD

-

Basic Materials

QRMI
1.1%
SHLD

-

Energy

QRMI
0.5%
SHLD

-

Financial Services

QRMI
0.2%
SHLD

-

Real Estate

QRMI
0.1%
SHLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QRMI vs. SHLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRMI
QRMI Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
QRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
QRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
QRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
QRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

SHLD
SHLD Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SHLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHLD Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
SHLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHLD Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QRMI vs. SHLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QRMISHLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.01

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

-0.03

+1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.66

-0.08

+5.74

QRMI vs. SHLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QRMI Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the SHLD Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRMI and SHLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QRMI vs. SHLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRMI drawdown since its inception was -20.95%, smaller than the maximum SHLD drawdown of -25.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRMI and SHLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QRMISHLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.95%

-25.40%

+4.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.04%

-25.40%

+20.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.81%

-22.99%

+20.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.81%

-3.90%

-3.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.19%

10.30%

-9.11%

Volatility

QRMI vs. SHLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) is 3.15%, while Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) has a volatility of 8.28%. This indicates that QRMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QRMISHLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.15%

8.28%

-5.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.63%

19.79%

-14.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.61%

25.12%

-18.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.40%

21.54%

-13.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.40%

21.54%

-13.14%

QRMI vs. SHLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

QRMI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SHLD's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

QRMI vs. SHLD - Dividend Comparison

QRMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.55%, more than SHLD's 0.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
QRMI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
12.55%12.28%11.80%12.44%10.65%3.36%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
0.71%0.55%0.53%0.26%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QRMI and SHLD have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHLD has higher volatility (8.28%) compared to QRMI (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QRMI dropped -20.95% vs SHLD's -25.40%.

On 1-year performance, QRMI leads with 6.74% vs -0.87% for SHLD. On fees, SHLD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, QRMI has been the lower-risk option at 3.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QRMI has performed better with a 6.74% return vs -0.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHLD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QRMI.

QRMI has the higher dividend yield at 12.55%, compared with 0.71% for SHLD.

QRMI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SHLD is Aerospace & Defense. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QRMI and 0.50% for SHLD.

QRMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QRMI and SHLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer