QRMI vs. ROCQ

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

QRMI (Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF) and ROCQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QRMI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ROCQ.

Performance

QRMI vs. ROCQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF (ROCQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QRMI

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 0.32%
• YTD: 2.36%
• 6M: 2.14%
• 1Y: 9.04%
• 3Y*: 7.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ROCQ

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: -0.97%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QRMI vs. ROCQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF	3.62%
ROCQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF	15.75%

Correlation

The correlation between QRMI and ROCQ is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026	0.84

Return for Risk

QRMI vs. ROCQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRMI

QRMI Risk / Return Rank: 49
QRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
QRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
QRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 56
QRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
QRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 51

ROCQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QRMI vs. ROCQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF (ROCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QRMI	ROCQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.83	—	—

Drawdowns

QRMI vs. ROCQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRMI drawdown since its inception was -20.95%, which is greater than ROCQ's maximum drawdown of -5.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRMI and ROCQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	QRMI	ROCQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.95%	-5.68%	-15.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.04%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.94%	-2.46%	+1.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.89%	-1.03%	-6.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.16%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QRMI	ROCQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.24%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.86%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.96%	19.32%	-13.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.34%	19.32%	-10.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.34%	19.32%	-10.98%

QRMI vs. ROCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QRMI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ROCQ's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

QRMI vs. ROCQ - Dividend Comparison

QRMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.34%, more than ROCQ's 2.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF	12.34%	12.28%	11.80%	12.44%	10.65%	3.36%
ROCQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF	2.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QRMI and ROCQ in my portfolio?

QRMI and ROCQ have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QRMI or ROCQ?

On fees, ROCQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QRMI or ROCQ?

ROCQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QRMI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QRMI or ROCQ?

QRMI has the higher dividend yield at 12.34%, compared with 2.07% for ROCQ.

What is the main difference between QRMI and ROCQ?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QRMI and 0.35% for ROCQ.