QRMI vs. ROCQ
QRMI (Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF) and ROCQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QRMI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ROCQ.
Performance
QRMI vs. ROCQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QRMI
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 1.85%
- YTD
- 2.60%
- 6M
- 3.95%
- 1Y
- 9.73%
- 3Y*
- 7.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROCQ
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 6.49%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QRMI vs. ROCQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF | 4.13% |
ROCQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF | 17.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between QRMI and ROCQ is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QRMI vs. ROCQ — Risk / Return Rank
QRMI
ROCQ
QRMI vs. ROCQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF (ROCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QRMI | ROCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.52 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QRMI | ROCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 7.49 | -7.27 |
Drawdowns
QRMI vs. ROCQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QRMI drawdown since its inception was -20.95%, which is greater than ROCQ's maximum drawdown of -5.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRMI and ROCQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QRMI | ROCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.95% | -5.15% | -15.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.33% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.98% | -0.66% | -7.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.14% | — | — |
Volatility
QRMI vs. ROCQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QRMI | ROCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.66% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.43% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.76% | 16.13% | -10.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.34% | 16.13% | -7.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.34% | 16.13% | -7.79% |
QRMI vs. ROCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QRMI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ROCQ's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
QRMI vs. ROCQ - Dividend Comparison
QRMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.19%, more than ROCQ's 2.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF | 12.19% | 12.28% | 11.80% | 12.44% | 10.65% | 3.36% |
ROCQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF | 2.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QRMI and ROCQ have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ROCQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ROCQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QRMI.
QRMI has the higher dividend yield at 12.19%, compared with 2.02% for ROCQ.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QRMI and 0.35% for ROCQ.
Find the right allocation for QRMI and ROCQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer