QRMI vs. QEW
QRMI (Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF) and QEW (Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QRMI is actively managed, while QEW is passively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QRMI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for QEW.
Performance
QRMI vs. QEW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QRMI
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 1.85%
- YTD
- 2.60%
- 6M
- 3.95%
- 1Y
- 9.73%
- 3Y*
- 7.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QEW
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 10.55%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QRMI vs. QEW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF | 3.86% |
QEW Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF | 21.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between QRMI and QEW is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QRMI vs. QEW — Risk / Return Rank
QRMI
QEW
QRMI vs. QEW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF (QEW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QRMI | QEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.52 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QRMI | QEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 9.75 | -9.53 |
Drawdowns
QRMI vs. QEW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QRMI drawdown since its inception was -20.95%, which is greater than QEW's maximum drawdown of -4.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRMI and QEW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QRMI | QEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.95% | -4.15% | -16.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.11% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.98% | -0.57% | -7.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.14% | — | — |
Volatility
QRMI vs. QEW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QRMI | QEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.66% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.43% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.76% | 15.78% | -10.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.34% | 15.78% | -7.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.34% | 15.78% | -7.44% |
QRMI vs. QEW - Expense Ratio Comparison
QRMI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QEW's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
QRMI vs. QEW - Dividend Comparison
QRMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.19%, while QEW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QEW Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF | 12.19% | 12.28% | 11.80% | 12.44% | 10.65% | 3.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QRMI and QEW have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QEW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QEW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QRMI.
QRMI has the higher dividend yield at 12.19%, compared with 0.00% for QEW.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QRMI and 0.25% for QEW.
Find the right allocation for QRMI and QEW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer