QRMI vs. EDGX
QRMI (Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF) and EDGX (Global X U.S. 500 Income Edge ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QRMI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Global X, while EDGX is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QRMI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for EDGX.
Performance
QRMI vs. EDGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QRMI
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- 6M
- 2.38%
- YTD
- 2.13%
- 1Y
- 8.80%
- 3Y*
- 6.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.58%
EDGX
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 2.12%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $169.59K | $164.97K | $167.67K | |
| $169.27K | $136.84K | $139.60K |
QRMI vs. EDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF | 3.23% |
EDGX Global X U.S. 500 Income Edge ETF | 12.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between QRMI and EDGX is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2026 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QRMI vs. EDGX — Risk / Return Rank
QRMI
EDGX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QRMI vs. EDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and Global X U.S. 500 Income Edge ETF (EDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QRMI | EDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.56 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QRMI vs. EDGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QRMI drawdown since its inception was -20.95%, which is greater than EDGX's maximum drawdown of -7.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRMI and EDGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QRMI | EDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.95% | -7.56% | -13.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | -0.03% | -1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.75% | -1.53% | -6.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.34% | — | — |
Volatility
QRMI vs. EDGX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QRMI | EDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.93% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.74% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.75% | 13.43% | -6.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.39% | 13.43% | -5.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.39% | 13.43% | -5.04% |
QRMI vs. EDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QRMI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than EDGX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
QRMI vs. EDGX - Dividend Comparison
QRMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.42%, more than EDGX's 3.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDGX Global X U.S. 500 Income Edge ETF | 3.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF | 12.42% | 12.28% | 11.80% | 12.44% | 10.65% | 3.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QRMI and EDGX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EDGX is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EDGX is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QRMI.
QRMI has the higher dividend yield at 12.42%, compared with 3.94% for EDGX.
QRMI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while EDGX is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QRMI and 0.00% for EDGX.
Find the right allocation for QRMI and EDGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer