QQXT vs. SGRT
QQXT (First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQXT is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Ex-Tech Sector Index, while SGRT is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund. QQXT is passively managed, while SGRT is actively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQXT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.
Performance
QQXT vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQXT achieves a -2.44% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 45.10% return.
QQXT
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -1.96%
- YTD
- -2.44%
- 6M
- -2.95%
- 1Y
- 0.72%
- 3Y*
- 6.63%
- 5Y*
- 3.50%
- 10Y*
- 10.59%
SGRT
- 1D
- -5.57%
- 1M
- 3.81%
- YTD
- 45.10%
- 6M
- 41.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQXT vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQXT First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund | -2.44% | 1.24% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 45.10% | 26.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQXT and SGRT is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQXT vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank
QQXT
SGRT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QQXT vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQXT | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.10 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.21 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQXT vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQXT drawdown since its inception was -57.45%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQXT and SGRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQXT | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.45% | -17.87% | -39.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.81% | -5.57% | -1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.10% | -3.22% | -4.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.43% | — | — |
Volatility
QQXT vs. SGRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQXT | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.95% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.92% | 35.41% | -24.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.27% | 35.41% | -19.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 35.41% | -17.92% |
QQXT vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQXT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQXT vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison
QQXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than SGRT's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQXT First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund | 1.24% | 1.20% | 0.98% | 1.10% | 0.92% | 0.35% | 0.28% | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.32% | 0.31% | 0.40% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 0.11% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQXT and SGRT have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGRT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGRT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QQXT.
QQXT has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.11% for SGRT.
QQXT is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SGRT is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QQXT and 0.59% for SGRT.
Find the right allocation for QQXT and SGRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer