QQXT vs. ROBT
QQXT (First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund) and ROBT (First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQXT is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Ex-Tech Sector Index, while ROBT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QQXT returned 3.64%/yr vs 1.40%/yr for ROBT. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQXT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ROBT.
Performance
QQXT vs. ROBT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQXT achieves a -0.56% return, which is significantly lower than ROBT's 7.10% return.
QQXT
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- 6M
- -1.70%
- YTD
- -0.56%
- 1Y
- 0.08%
- 3Y*
- 5.66%
- 5Y*
- 3.64%
- 10Y*
- 9.97%
ROBT
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 7.10%
- 1Y
- 15.05%
- 3Y*
- 6.34%
- 5Y*
- 1.40%
- 10Y*
- —
QQXT vs. ROBT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQXT First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund | -0.56% | 8.02% | 6.71% | 16.81% | -13.09% | 12.02% | 36.85% | 28.02% | -8.08% |
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF | 7.10% | 15.16% | -0.41% | 27.77% | -34.94% | 9.91% | 46.18% | 34.28% | -14.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQXT and ROBT is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2018 | 0.77 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QQXT and ROBT has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
QQXT vs. ROBT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQXT
ROBT
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Technology
Utilities
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Industrials
QQXT
ROBT
Consumer Cyclical
QQXT
ROBT
Healthcare
QQXT
ROBT
Consumer Defensive
QQXT
ROBT
Communication Services
QQXT
ROBT
Technology
QQXT
ROBT
Utilities
QQXT
ROBT
-
Energy
QQXT
ROBT
Basic Materials
QQXT
ROBT
-
Financial Services
QQXT
ROBT
Real Estate
QQXT
ROBT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQXT vs. ROBT — Risk / Return Rank
QQXT
ROBT
QQXT vs. ROBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) and First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQXT | ROBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.12 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.01 | 0.70 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.02 | 1.89 | -1.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQXT vs. ROBT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQXT drawdown since its inception was -57.45%, which is greater than ROBT's maximum drawdown of -44.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQXT and ROBT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQXT | ROBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.45% | -44.47% | -12.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.59% | -21.66% | +14.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.92% | -27.68% | +12.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.74% | -43.26% | +18.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.01% | -7.85% | +2.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.09% | -15.86% | +7.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.62% | 7.97% | -4.35% |
Volatility
QQXT vs. ROBT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) is 3.59%, while First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) has a volatility of 6.80%. This indicates that QQXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQXT | ROBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.59% | 6.80% | -3.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.18% | 19.41% | -11.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.00% | 24.89% | -13.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 25.54% | -9.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 25.56% | -8.11% |
QQXT vs. ROBT - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQXT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ROBT's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQXT vs. ROBT - Dividend Comparison
QQXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, more than ROBT's 0.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQXT First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund | 1.25% | 1.20% | 0.98% | 1.10% | 0.92% | 0.35% | 0.28% | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.32% | 0.31% | 0.40% |
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.68% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.06% | 0.17% | 0.42% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQXT and ROBT have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROBT has higher volatility (6.80%) compared to QQXT (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQXT dropped -57.45% vs ROBT's -44.47%.
On 5-year performance, QQXT leads with 3.64% vs 1.40% for ROBT. On fees, QQXT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QQXT has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQXT has performed better with a 3.64% return vs 1.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQXT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ROBT.
QQXT has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.02% for ROBT.
QQXT is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ROBT is Technology Equities. QQXT tracks NASDAQ-100 Ex-Tech Sector Index, while ROBT tracks Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QQXT and 0.65% for ROBT.
ROBT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQXT and ROBT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer