PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQXT vs. QNXT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQXT vs. QNXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) and iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQXT achieves a 1.95% return, which is significantly lower than QNXT's 12.29% return.


QQXT

1D
0.81%
1M
0.95%
6M
0.82%
YTD
1.95%
1Y
4.55%
3Y*
6.80%
5Y*
3.88%
10Y*
10.10%
ALL TIME*
9.15%

QNXT

1D
0.57%
1M
-1.03%
6M
10.78%
YTD
12.29%
1Y
19.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$139.17K$113.59K$235.01K
$265.60K$403.02K$549.03K

QQXT vs. QNXT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQXT
First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund
1.95%8.02%0.20%
QNXT
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF
12.29%14.97%-2.58%

Correlation

The correlation between QQXT and QNXT is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2024

0.72

The correlation between QQXT and QNXT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQXT vs. QNXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QQXT
QQXT Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
QQXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQXT Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
QQXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQXT Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

QNXT
QNXT Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
QNXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QNXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
QNXT Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
QNXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
QNXT Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QQXT vs. QNXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) and iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQXTQNXTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.22

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.60

1.96

-1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.30

5.94

-4.64

QQXT vs. QNXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQXT Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the QNXT Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQXT and QNXT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQXT vs. QNXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQXT drawdown since its inception was -57.45%, which is greater than QNXT's maximum drawdown of -22.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQXT and QNXT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQXTQNXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.45%

-22.25%

-35.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.59%

-10.16%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.61%

-3.51%

+0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.08%

-3.75%

-4.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

3.35%

+0.17%

Volatility

QQXT vs. QNXT - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT) at 3.64%. This indicates that QQXT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QNXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQXTQNXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

3.64%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.68%

11.97%

-3.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.18%

15.97%

-4.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.34%

19.53%

-3.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.48%

19.53%

-2.05%

QQXT vs. QNXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQXT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QNXT's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQXT vs. QNXT - Dividend Comparison

QQXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, more than QNXT's 0.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QNXT
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF
0.67%0.64%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQXT
First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund
1.22%1.20%0.98%1.10%0.92%0.35%0.28%0.35%0.38%0.32%0.31%0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQXT and QNXT have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQXT has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to QNXT (3.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQXT dropped -57.45% vs QNXT's -22.25%.

On 1-year performance, QNXT leads with 19.85% vs 4.55% for QQXT. On fees, QNXT is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, QNXT has been the lower-risk option at 3.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QNXT has performed better with a 19.85% return vs 4.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QNXT is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QQXT.

QQXT has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.67% for QNXT.

QQXT tracks NASDAQ-100 Ex-Tech Sector Index, while QNXT tracks Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 UCITS Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QQXT and 0.20% for QNXT.

QNXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQXT and QNXT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer