PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQXT vs. PBQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQXT vs. PBQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) and PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQXT achieves a -2.44% return, which is significantly lower than PBQQ's 8.21% return.


QQXT

1D
0.26%
1M
-1.96%
YTD
-2.44%
6M
-2.95%
1Y
0.72%
3Y*
6.63%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*
10.59%

PBQQ

1D
-0.75%
1M
-0.22%
YTD
8.21%
6M
8.11%
1Y
19.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQXT vs. PBQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QQXT and PBQQ is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2025

0.61

The correlation between QQXT and PBQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQXT vs. PBQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQXT
QQXT Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
QQXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQXT Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
QQXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQXT Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

PBQQ
PBQQ Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
PBQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PBQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQXT vs. PBQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) and PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQXTPBQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.52

-0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.10

4.08

-3.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.21

19.12

-18.91

QQXT vs. PBQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQXT Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the PBQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQXT and PBQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQXT vs. PBQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQXT drawdown since its inception was -57.45%, which is greater than PBQQ's maximum drawdown of -12.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQXT and PBQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQXTPBQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.45%

-12.92%

-44.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.59%

-4.71%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.81%

-1.02%

-5.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.10%

-1.24%

-6.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

1.00%

+2.43%

Volatility

QQXT vs. PBQQ - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) has a higher volatility of 3.00% compared to PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ) at 2.24%. This indicates that QQXT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQXTPBQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

2.24%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.95%

5.77%

+2.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.92%

7.32%

+3.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.27%

11.79%

+4.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

11.79%

+5.70%

QQXT vs. PBQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQXT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than PBQQ's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQXT vs. PBQQ - Dividend Comparison

QQXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than PBQQ's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBQQ
PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF
0.01%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQXT
First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund
1.24%1.20%0.98%1.10%0.92%0.35%0.28%0.35%0.38%0.32%0.31%0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQXT and PBQQ have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQXT has higher volatility (3.00%) compared to PBQQ (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQXT dropped -57.45% vs PBQQ's -12.92%.

On 1-year performance, PBQQ leads with 19.15% vs 0.72% for QQXT. On fees, PBQQ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PBQQ has been the lower-risk option at 2.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PBQQ has performed better with a 19.15% return vs 0.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PBQQ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QQXT.

QQXT has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.01% for PBQQ.

QQXT is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while PBQQ is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QQXT and 0.50% for PBQQ.

PBQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQXT and PBQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer