PBQQ vs. PQAP

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

PBQQ (PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF) and PQAP (PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds from PGIM. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PBQQ returned 15.21% vs 17.14% for PQAP. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

PBQQ vs. PQAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBQQ achieves a 7.67% return, which is significantly lower than PQAP's 11.16% return.

PBQQ

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: -0.58%
• 6M: 6.95%
• YTD: 7.67%
• 1Y: 15.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.82%

PQAP

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 0.05%
• 6M: 10.55%
• YTD: 11.16%
• 1Y: 17.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PBQQ PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF	$349.13K	$445.65K	$905.94K
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April	$40.20K	$92.99K	$132.77K

PBQQ vs. PQAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PBQQ PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF	7.67%	15.44%
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April	11.16%	14.48%

Correlation

The correlation between PBQQ and PQAP is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2025	0.93

The correlation between PBQQ and PQAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PBQQ vs. PQAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PBQQ

PBQQ Risk / Return Rank: 82
PBQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
PBQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
PBQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 81
PBQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
PBQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 87

PQAP

PQAP Risk / Return Rank: 96
PQAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
PQAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
PQAP Omega Ratio Rank: 96
PQAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
PQAP Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PBQQ vs. PQAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PBQQ	PQAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	2.98	-1.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	4.58	-1.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.65	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.02	6.45	-3.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.86	32.16	-19.30

PBQQ vs. PQAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBQQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is lower than the PQAP Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBQQ and PQAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PBQQ vs. PQAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBQQ drawdown since its inception was -12.92%, which is greater than PQAP's maximum drawdown of -10.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBQQ and PQAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBQQ	PQAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.92%	-10.79%	-2.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.71%	-2.52%	-2.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.51%	-0.95%	-0.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.23%	-0.64%	-0.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.11%	0.51%	+0.60%

Volatility

PBQQ vs. PQAP - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ) has a higher volatility of 3.00% compared to PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP) at 2.36%. This indicates that PBQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PQAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PBQQ	PQAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.00%	2.36%	+0.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.36%	4.66%	+1.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.81%	5.46%	+2.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.64%	10.82%	+0.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.64%	10.82%	+0.82%

PBQQ vs. PQAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PBQQ and PQAP have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

PBQQ vs. PQAP - Dividend Comparison

PBQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than PQAP's 0.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
PBQQ PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF	0.01%	0.01%
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April	0.02%	0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PBQQ and PQAP in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, PBQQ and PQAP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PBQQ or PQAP?

PBQQ has higher volatility (3.00%) compared to PQAP (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBQQ dropped -12.92% vs PQAP's -10.79%.

Which ETF is better, PBQQ or PQAP?

On 1-year performance, PQAP leads with 17.14% vs 15.21% for PBQQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, PQAP has been the lower-risk option at 2.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PBQQ or PQAP?

Over the 1-year period, PQAP has performed better with a 17.14% return vs 15.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PBQQ or PQAP?

PBQQ and PQAP have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PBQQ or PQAP?

PQAP has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.01% for PBQQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PQAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.