PBQQ vs. GPIQ
PBQQ (PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF) and GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds — PBQQ is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by PGIM, while GPIQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PBQQ returned 28.19% vs 42.77% for GPIQ. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PBQQ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIQ.
Performance
PBQQ vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBQQ achieves a 4.74% return, which is significantly lower than GPIQ's 5.77% return.
PBQQ
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 5.21%
- YTD
- 4.74%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 28.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GPIQ
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 7.28%
- YTD
- 5.77%
- 6M
- 8.75%
- 1Y
- 42.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBQQ vs. GPIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBQQ PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF | 4.74% | 15.44% |
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 5.77% | 19.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBQQ and GPIQ is 0.98 — these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025 | 0.98 |
The correlation between PBQQ and GPIQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBQQ vs. GPIQ — Risk / Return Rank
PBQQ
GPIQ
PBQQ vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBQQ | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.46 | 3.01 | +0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.32 | 4.03 | +1.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.73 | 1.55 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.53 | 4.09 | +1.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.21 | 18.04 | +8.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBQQ | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.46 | 3.01 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.30 | 1.53 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
PBQQ vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBQQ drawdown since its inception was -12.92%, smaller than the maximum GPIQ drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBQQ and GPIQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBQQ | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.92% | -21.06% | +8.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.71% | -9.51% | +4.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.37% | -2.37% | +1.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 2.16% | -1.17% |
Volatility
PBQQ vs. GPIQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ) is 3.56%, while Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) has a volatility of 6.05%. This indicates that PBQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PBQQ | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.56% | 6.05% | -2.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.87% | 11.13% | -5.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.22% | 14.37% | -6.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.35% | 17.70% | -5.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.35% | 17.70% | -5.35% |
PBQQ vs. GPIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBQQ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIQ's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBQQ vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison
PBQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than GPIQ's 9.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PBQQ PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 9.88% | 9.81% | 9.18% | 1.74% |