QQXL vs. HOOG
QQXL (ProShares Ultra QQQ Top 30) and HOOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQXL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for HOOG.
Performance
QQXL vs. HOOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQXL achieves a 41.81% return, which is significantly higher than HOOG's -55.34% return.
QQXL
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- 16.51%
- YTD
- 41.81%
- 6M
- 39.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOOG
- 1D
- 12.78%
- 1M
- 23.20%
- YTD
- -55.34%
- 6M
- -70.69%
- 1Y
- -21.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQXL vs. HOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQXL ProShares Ultra QQQ Top 30 | 41.81% | 8.66% |
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF | -55.34% | -22.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQXL and HOOG is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2025 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQXL vs. HOOG — Risk / Return Rank
QQXL
HOOG
QQXL vs. HOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ Top 30 (QQXL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQXL | HOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.95 | 0.41 | +1.54 |
Drawdowns
QQXL vs. HOOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQXL drawdown since its inception was -27.34%, smaller than the maximum HOOG drawdown of -86.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQXL and HOOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQXL | HOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.34% | -86.94% | +59.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -86.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.84% | -79.17% | +77.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.74% | -37.70% | +30.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 53.46% | — |
Volatility
QQXL vs. HOOG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQXL | HOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 43.09% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 101.33% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.93% | 137.25% | -100.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.93% | 145.07% | -108.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.93% | 145.07% | -108.14% |
QQXL vs. HOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQXL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than HOOG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQXL vs. HOOG - Dividend Comparison
QQXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than HOOG's 27.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF | 27.55% | 12.30% |
QQXL ProShares Ultra QQQ Top 30 | 0.45% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQXL and HOOG have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HOOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HOOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QQXL.
HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 27.55%, compared with 0.45% for QQXL.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QQXL and 0.75% for HOOG.
Find the right allocation for QQXL and HOOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer