PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
QQWZ vs. GCOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

QQWZ vs. GCOW

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW).

QQWZ and GCOW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QQWZ is an actively managed fund by Pacer. It was launched on May 6, 2025. GCOW is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. It was launched on Feb 23, 2016.

Performance

QQWZ vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQWZ vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
QQWZ
Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF		4.75%26.23%
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF		12.89%16.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQWZ achieves a 4.75% return, which is significantly lower than GCOW's 12.89% return.

QQWZ

1D
-0.31%
1M
-3.59%
YTD
4.75%
6M
5.81%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

GCOW

1D
-0.28%
1M
-1.51%
YTD
12.89%
6M
18.87%
1Y
30.54%
3Y*
16.78%
5Y*
13.59%
10Y*
10.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF

Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF

Often compared with QQWZ:
QQWZ vs. SHLDQQWZ vs. CGDVQQWZ vs. COWZQQWZ vs. QQQMQQWZ vs. BTC-USDQQWZ vs. RWLQQWZ vs. SPMO
Often compared with GCOW:
GCOW vs. COWZGCOW vs. ICOWGCOW vs. SCHDGCOW vs. AVDEGCOW vs. SPYGCOW vs. VXUSGCOW vs. MOTG

QQWZ vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQWZ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.

GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
QQWZ
Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF

Return for Risk

QQWZ vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
QQWZ
GCOW
GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQWZ vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QQWZ vs. GCOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

QQWZGCOWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

—

2.21

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

1.01

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.63

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.52

0.60

+1.93

Correlation

The correlation between QQWZ and GCOW is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

QQWZ vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison

QQWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than GCOW's 4.41% yield.

TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
QQWZ
Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF		0.35%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF		4.41%4.06%5.14%5.28%4.39%4.23%4.12%4.40%3.94%2.79%1.95%

Drawdowns

QQWZ vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQWZ drawdown since its inception was -7.81%, smaller than the maximum GCOW drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQWZ and GCOW.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

QQWZGCOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.81%

-37.64%

+29.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-10.79%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-21.48%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-37.64%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.61%

-2.11%

-1.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.29%

-5.90%

+4.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

2.18%

—

Volatility

QQWZ vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

QQWZGCOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

3.45%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

7.89%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.51%

13.89%

+0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.51%

13.48%

+1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.51%

16.24%

-1.73%