PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQUP vs. HDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQUP vs. HDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Top QQQ (QQUP) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQUP achieves a -3.91% return, which is significantly lower than HDV's 14.07% return.


QQUP

1D
-3.22%
1M
-16.85%
YTD
-3.91%
6M
-6.57%
1Y
38.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HDV

1D
1.33%
1M
-1.35%
YTD
14.07%
6M
14.08%
1Y
21.06%
3Y*
15.48%
5Y*
11.09%
10Y*
9.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQUP vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QQUP
ProShares Ultra Top QQQ
-3.91%45.33%
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
14.07%6.11%

Correlation

The correlation between QQUP and HDV is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025

-0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQUP vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQUP
QQUP Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
QQUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQUP Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
QQUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQUP Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

HDV
HDV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
HDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
HDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDV Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQUP vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Top QQQ (QQUP) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQUPHDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.36

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

4.09

-3.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.87

11.19

-8.31

QQUP vs. HDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQUP Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the HDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQUP and HDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQUP vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQUP drawdown since its inception was -37.67%, roughly equal to the maximum HDV drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQUP and HDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQUPHDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.67%

-37.04%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.67%

-5.18%

-32.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.46%

-1.35%

-20.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.48%

-3.08%

-6.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.45%

1.89%

+11.56%

Volatility

QQUP vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Top QQQ (QQUP) has a higher volatility of 14.01% compared to iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) at 3.64%. This indicates that QQUP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQUPHDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.01%

3.64%

+10.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.62%

7.61%

+23.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.03%

9.93%

+30.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.79%

12.81%

+26.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.79%

15.73%

+24.06%

QQUP vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQUP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQUP vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison

QQUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than HDV's 2.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
2.90%3.22%3.67%3.82%3.56%3.47%4.07%3.27%3.67%3.27%3.28%3.92%
QQUP
ProShares Ultra Top QQQ
0.50%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQUP and HDV have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQUP has higher volatility (14.01%) compared to HDV (3.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQUP dropped -37.67% vs HDV's -37.04%.

On 1-year performance, QQUP leads with 38.57% vs 21.06% for HDV. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQUP has performed better with a 38.57% return vs 21.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QQUP.

HDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 0.50% for QQUP.

QQUP is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while HDV is Dividend. QQUP tracks Nasdaq-100 Mega Index (200%), while HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QQUP and 0.08% for HDV.

HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQUP and HDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer