QQQX vs. ETW
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) and Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETW).
QQQX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq 100 Index. It was launched on Jan 30, 2007.
Performance
QQQX vs. ETW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QQQX vs. ETW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQX Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund | -0.51% | 14.87% | 25.61% | 21.68% | -27.39% | 25.32% | 15.75% | 28.83% | -11.68% | 39.19% |
ETW Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund | -1.13% | 20.10% | 19.03% | 9.34% | -23.87% | 25.36% | 3.24% | 18.87% | -12.10% | 30.42% |
Fundamentals
QQQX:
$1.39B
ETW:
$968.69M
QQQX:
$7.57
ETW:
$2.74
QQQX:
3.75
ETW:
3.26
QQQX:
0.43
ETW:
0.09
QQQX:
8.63
ETW:
5.71
QQQX:
1.01
ETW:
0.87
QQQX:
$160.60M
ETW:
$169.79M
QQQX:
$152.14M
ETW:
$121.86M
QQQX:
$369.75M
ETW:
$296.96M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQX achieves a -0.51% return, which is significantly higher than ETW's -1.13% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQX has outperformed ETW with an annualized return of 11.87%, while ETW has yielded a comparatively lower 7.94% annualized return.
QQQX
- 1D
- 4.05%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- -0.51%
- 6M
- 4.98%
- 1Y
- 26.55%
- 3Y*
- 13.53%
- 5Y*
- 8.16%
- 10Y*
- 11.87%
ETW
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- -4.90%
- YTD
- -1.13%
- 6M
- 2.63%
- 1Y
- 18.63%
- 3Y*
- 13.24%
- 5Y*
- 6.18%
- 10Y*
- 7.94%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQX vs. ETW — Risk / Return Rank
QQQX
ETW
QQQX vs. ETW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) and Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQX | ETW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.26 | 1.02 | +0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.87 | 1.60 | +0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.25 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | 1.45 | +0.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.38 | 7.33 | +3.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQX | ETW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 1.02 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.37 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.40 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.33 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQX and ETW is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
QQQX vs. ETW - Dividend Comparison
QQQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.27%, less than ETW's 8.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQX Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund | 8.27% | 7.85% | 6.73% | 7.26% | 9.66% | 5.85% | 6.00% | 6.49% | 8.40% | 5.95% | 7.54% | 7.23% |
ETW Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund | 8.93% | 8.64% | 9.17% | 8.99% | 10.87% | 7.80% | 9.01% | 8.41% | 11.46% | 9.27% | 11.59% | 10.40% |
Drawdowns
QQQX vs. ETW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQX drawdown since its inception was -57.25%, which is greater than ETW's maximum drawdown of -54.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQX and ETW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQX | ETW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.25% | -54.13% | -3.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.93% | -12.62% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.33% | -27.94% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.96% | -47.96% | +12.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -5.50% | +4.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.09% | -7.75% | -0.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 2.50% | +0.11% |
Volatility
QQQX vs. ETW - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) has a higher volatility of 8.15% compared to Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETW) at 6.68%. This indicates that QQQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QQQX | ETW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.15% | 6.68% | +1.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.99% | 9.65% | +2.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.13% | 18.27% | +2.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.80% | 16.75% | +3.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.05% | 19.83% | +1.22% |