ETW vs. EOS-USD
ETW (Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund) is a stock, while EOS-USD (EOS) is a cryptocurrency. Over the past 5 years, ETW returned 6.12%/yr vs -55.44%/yr for EOS-USD. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ETW vs. EOS-USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETW achieves a 5.63% return, which is significantly higher than EOS-USD's -60.86% return.
ETW
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 5.63%
- 6M
- 5.28%
- 1Y
- 19.92%
- 3Y*
- 15.04%
- 5Y*
- 6.12%
- 10Y*
- 8.51%
EOS-USD
- 1D
- -4.95%
- 1M
- -21.16%
- YTD
- -60.86%
- 6M
- -61.53%
- 1Y
- -87.85%
- 3Y*
- -55.88%
- 5Y*
- -55.44%
- 10Y*
- —
ETW vs. EOS-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETW Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund | 5.63% | 20.10% | 19.03% | 9.34% | -23.87% | 25.36% | 3.24% | 18.87% | -12.10% | 9.12% |
EOS-USD EOS | -60.86% | -79.52% | -8.35% | -1.89% | -71.60% | 16.76% | 0.93% | 0.16% | -70.72% | 2,091.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETW and EOS-USD is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2017 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETW vs. EOS-USD — Risk / Return Rank
ETW
EOS-USD
ETW vs. EOS-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETW) and EOS (EOS-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETW | EOS-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 0.68 | +0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | -0.99 | +2.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.26 | -1.34 | +10.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETW vs. EOS-USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETW drawdown since its inception was -54.13%, smaller than the maximum EOS-USD drawdown of -99.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETW and EOS-USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETW | EOS-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.13% | -99.71% | +45.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.16% | -90.06% | +79.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.28% | -95.47% | +79.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.94% | -99.02% | +71.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.71% | -99.71% | +98.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.69% | -84.95% | +77.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 67.65% | -65.49% |
Volatility
ETW vs. EOS-USD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETW) is 3.69%, while EOS (EOS-USD) has a volatility of 30.58%. This indicates that ETW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EOS-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETW | EOS-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.69% | 30.58% | -26.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.18% | 57.71% | -47.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.46% | 63.82% | -51.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.69% | 71.85% | -55.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.88% | 109.12% | -89.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETW and EOS-USD have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EOS-USD has higher volatility (30.58%) compared to ETW (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETW dropped -54.13% vs EOS-USD's -99.71%.
ETW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs -1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETW and EOS-USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer