QQQX vs. FNGS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QQQX (Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund) and FNGS (MicroSectors FANG+ ETN) are both funds - QQQX is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Nuveen, while FNGS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index. QQQX is actively managed, while FNGS is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QQQX returned 8.34%/yr vs 18.21%/yr for FNGS. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQX charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for FNGS.

Performance

QQQX vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQX achieves a 7.43% return, which is significantly higher than FNGS's 5.66% return.

QQQX

• 1D: -2.09%
• 1M: -2.20%
• YTD: 7.43%
• 6M: 7.82%
• 1Y: 25.88%
• 3Y*: 14.83%
• 5Y*: 8.34%
• 10Y*: 13.43%

FNGS

• 1D: -2.36%
• 1M: -3.57%
• YTD: 5.66%
• 6M: 4.04%
• 1Y: 17.25%
• 3Y*: 29.30%
• 5Y*: 18.21%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQX vs. FNGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
QQQX Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund	7.43%	14.87%	25.61%	21.68%	-27.39%	25.32%	15.75%	2.71%
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	5.66%	18.64%	51.99%	95.24%	-40.32%	16.96%	101.99%	10.10%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQX and FNGS is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2019	0.76

The correlation between QQQX and FNGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QQQX vs. FNGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQX

QQQX Risk / Return Rank: 50
QQQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
QQQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
QQQX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
QQQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
QQQX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

FNGS

FNGS Risk / Return Rank: 21
FNGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
FNGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
FNGS Omega Ratio Rank: 21
FNGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
FNGS Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQX vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQQX	FNGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	0.77	+0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	1.18	+1.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.15	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	0.76	+2.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.24	2.12	+10.11

QQQX vs. FNGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the FNGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQX and FNGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQQX vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQX drawdown since its inception was -57.25%, which is greater than FNGS's maximum drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQX and FNGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQX	FNGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.25%	-48.98%	-8.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.11%	-22.93%	+13.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.80%	-26.77%	+3.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.33%	-48.98%	+19.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.62%	-10.58%	+4.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.01%	-10.84%	+2.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.12%	8.14%	-6.02%

Volatility

QQQX vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) is 6.07%, while MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) has a volatility of 10.97%. This indicates that QQQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQX	FNGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.07%	10.97%	-4.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.46%	18.01%	-5.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.14%	22.63%	-7.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.94%	30.25%	-10.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.11%	31.24%	-10.13%

QQQX vs. FNGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than FNGS's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQX vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison

QQQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.45%, while FNGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQX Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund	8.45%	7.85%	6.73%	7.26%	9.66%	5.85%	6.00%	6.49%	8.40%	5.95%	7.54%	7.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQX and FNGS in my portfolio?

QQQX and FNGS have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQQX or FNGS?

FNGS has higher volatility (10.97%) compared to QQQX (6.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQX dropped -57.25% vs FNGS's -48.98%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.