PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETW vs. ETV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ETW vs. ETV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETW) and Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETW achieves a 6.23% return, which is significantly lower than ETV's 7.46% return. Over the past 10 years, ETW has underperformed ETV with an annualized return of 8.43%, while ETV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.31% annualized return.


ETW

1D
-0.63%
1M
2.00%
YTD
6.23%
6M
7.82%
1Y
22.13%
3Y*
15.15%
5Y*
6.22%
10Y*
8.43%

ETV

1D
-0.27%
1M
2.96%
YTD
7.46%
6M
8.52%
1Y
19.27%
3Y*
16.37%
5Y*
7.61%
10Y*
9.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETW vs. ETV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ETW
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund
6.23%20.10%19.03%9.34%-23.87%25.36%3.24%18.87%-12.10%30.42%
ETV
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund
7.46%8.63%27.67%9.94%-19.73%18.41%13.03%21.25%-4.29%12.98%

Correlation

The correlation between ETW and ETV is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2005

0.72

The correlation between ETW and ETV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ETW:

$1.03B

ETV:

$1.74B

EPS

ETW:

$2.74

ETV:

$4.95

PE Ratio

ETW:

3.45

ETV:

3.01

PEG Ratio

ETW:

0.09

ETV:

0.10

PS Ratio

ETW:

6.04

ETV:

5.73

PB Ratio

ETW:

0.92

ETV:

0.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

ETW:

$169.79M

ETV:

$303.84M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ETW:

$121.86M

ETV:

$149.51M

EBITDA (TTM)

ETW:

$296.96M

ETV:

$578.17M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETW vs. ETV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETW
ETW Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ETW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETW Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ETW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETW Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

ETV
ETV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ETV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
ETV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETV Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETW vs. ETV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETW) and Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETWETVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.28

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

1.87

+0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.49

9.60

+0.89

ETW vs. ETV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETW Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the ETV Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETW and ETV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETWETVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

1.58

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.45

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.48

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.43

-0.08

Drawdowns

ETW vs. ETV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETW drawdown since its inception was -54.13%, roughly equal to the maximum ETV drawdown of -52.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETW and ETV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETWETVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.13%

-52.11%

-2.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.16%

-10.34%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.28%

-20.27%

+3.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.94%

-22.71%

-5.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.96%

-42.39%

-5.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.15%

-0.27%

-0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.69%

-5.58%

-2.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

2.01%

+0.10%

Volatility

ETW vs. ETV - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETW) has a higher volatility of 3.70% compared to Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETV) at 3.40%. This indicates that ETW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETWETVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

3.40%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.70%

10.01%

-0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.14%

12.24%

-0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.71%

16.88%

-0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.87%

19.33%

+0.54%

Dividends

ETW vs. ETV - Dividend Comparison

ETW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.43%, more than ETV's 7.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETV
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund
7.99%8.30%8.18%9.24%10.57%7.94%8.66%8.89%9.86%8.65%8.96%8.69%
ETW
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund
8.43%8.64%9.17%8.99%10.87%7.80%9.01%8.41%11.46%9.27%11.59%10.40%

Financials

ETW vs. ETV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund and Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M20212022202320242025
43.46M
72.11M
(ETW) Total Revenue
(ETV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ETW and ETV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETW has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to ETV (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETW dropped -54.13% vs ETV's -52.11%.

ETW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETW and ETV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer