PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETW vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ETW vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETW) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETW achieves a 8.34% return, which is significantly higher than T's -10.13% return. Over the past 10 years, ETW has outperformed T with an annualized return of 8.74%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 1.81% annualized return.


ETW

1D
-0.52%
1M
2.75%
6M
7.30%
YTD
8.34%
1Y
20.04%
3Y*
14.57%
5Y*
6.10%
10Y*
8.74%

T

1D
1.99%
1M
-7.39%
6M
-7.05%
YTD
-10.13%
1Y
-16.34%
3Y*
20.29%
5Y*
6.14%
10Y*
1.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETW vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ETW
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund
8.34%20.10%19.03%9.34%-23.87%25.36%3.24%18.87%-12.10%30.42%
T
AT&T Inc.
-10.13%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between ETW and T is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2005

0.34

The correlation between ETW and T shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ETW:

$1.04B

T:

$149.84B

EPS

ETW:

$2.74

T:

$3.05

PE Ratio

ETW:

3.50

T:

7.06

PEG Ratio

ETW:

0.10

T:

0.29

PS Ratio

ETW:

6.12

T:

1.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

ETW:

$169.79M

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ETW:

$121.86M

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

ETW:

$296.96M

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETW vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETW
ETW Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ETW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETW Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
ETW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETW Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETW vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETW) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ETWTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

0.90

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

-0.57

+2.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.29

-1.31

+10.59

ETW vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETW Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETW and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ETW vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETW drawdown since its inception was -54.13%, smaller than the maximum T drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETW and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETWTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.13%

-64.15%

+10.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.16%

-28.89%

+18.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.28%

-28.89%

+12.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.94%

-32.01%

+4.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.96%

-42.35%

-5.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-24.17%

+23.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.67%

-15.73%

+8.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

12.52%

-10.36%

Volatility

ETW vs. T - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETW) is 4.08%, while AT&T Inc. (T) has a volatility of 10.00%. This indicates that ETW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETWTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

10.00%

-5.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.58%

19.81%

-9.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.71%

23.52%

-10.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.73%

24.36%

-7.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.85%

23.90%

-4.05%

Dividends

ETW vs. T - Dividend Comparison

ETW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.33%, more than T's 5.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETW
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund
8.33%8.64%9.17%8.99%10.87%7.80%9.01%8.41%11.46%9.27%11.59%10.40%
T
AT&T Inc.
5.15%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

ETW vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
43.46M
33.47B
(ETW) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ETW and T have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

T has higher volatility (10.00%) compared to ETW (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETW dropped -54.13% vs T's -64.15%.

ETW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETW and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer