QQQT vs. PBQQ
QQQT (Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF) and PBQQ (PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQT is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Defiance, while PBQQ is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by PGIM. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QQQT returned 26.06% vs 17.92% for PBQQ. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. QQQT charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PBQQ.
Performance
QQQT vs. PBQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQT achieves a 14.34% return, which is significantly higher than PBQQ's 8.11% return.
QQQT
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- YTD
- 14.34%
- 6M
- 12.96%
- 1Y
- 26.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBQQ
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- 8.11%
- 6M
- 7.78%
- 1Y
- 17.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQT vs. PBQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQQT Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF | 14.34% | 14.04% |
PBQQ PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF | 8.11% | 15.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQT and PBQQ is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2025 | 0.95 |
The correlation between QQQT and PBQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQT vs. PBQQ — Risk / Return Rank
QQQT
PBQQ
QQQT vs. PBQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT) and PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQT | PBQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.49 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 3.82 | -1.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.02 | 17.84 | -10.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQT vs. PBQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQT drawdown since its inception was -22.50%, which is greater than PBQQ's maximum drawdown of -12.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQT and PBQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQT | PBQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.50% | -12.92% | -9.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.73% | -4.71% | -8.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.56% | -1.11% | -3.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.98% | -1.24% | -2.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.72% | 1.01% | +2.71% |
Volatility
QQQT vs. PBQQ - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT) has a higher volatility of 8.63% compared to PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ) at 2.24%. This indicates that QQQT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQT | PBQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.63% | 2.24% | +6.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.54% | 5.76% | +7.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.55% | 7.29% | +9.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.77% | 11.77% | +9.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.77% | 11.77% | +9.00% |
QQQT vs. PBQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQT has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than PBQQ's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQT vs. PBQQ - Dividend Comparison
QQQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.02%, more than PBQQ's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
PBQQ PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% |
QQQT Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF | 20.02% | 21.27% | 10.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, QQQT and PBQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QQQT has higher volatility (8.63%) compared to PBQQ (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQT dropped -22.50% vs PBQQ's -12.92%.
On 1-year performance, QQQT leads with 26.06% vs 17.92% for PBQQ. On fees, PBQQ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PBQQ has been the lower-risk option at 2.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQT has performed better with a 26.06% return vs 17.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PBQQ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for QQQT.
QQQT has the higher dividend yield at 20.02%, compared with 0.01% for PBQQ.
QQQT is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while PBQQ is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for QQQT and 0.50% for PBQQ.
PBQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQT and PBQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer