PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQT vs. PBQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQT vs. PBQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT) and PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQT achieves a 14.34% return, which is significantly higher than PBQQ's 8.11% return.


QQQT

1D
-0.64%
1M
-1.05%
YTD
14.34%
6M
12.96%
1Y
26.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PBQQ

1D
-0.09%
1M
-0.32%
YTD
8.11%
6M
7.78%
1Y
17.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQT vs. PBQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QQQT and PBQQ is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2025

0.95

The correlation between QQQT and PBQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQT vs. PBQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQT
QQQT Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
QQQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQT Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQT Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

PBQQ
PBQQ Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
PBQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
PBQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQT vs. PBQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT) and PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQTPBQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.49

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

3.82

-1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.02

17.84

-10.82

QQQT vs. PBQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQT Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the PBQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQT and PBQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQT vs. PBQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQT drawdown since its inception was -22.50%, which is greater than PBQQ's maximum drawdown of -12.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQT and PBQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQTPBQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.50%

-12.92%

-9.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.73%

-4.71%

-8.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.56%

-1.11%

-3.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.98%

-1.24%

-2.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.72%

1.01%

+2.71%

Volatility

QQQT vs. PBQQ - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT) has a higher volatility of 8.63% compared to PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ) at 2.24%. This indicates that QQQT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQTPBQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.63%

2.24%

+6.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.54%

5.76%

+7.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.55%

7.29%

+9.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.77%

11.77%

+9.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.77%

11.77%

+9.00%

QQQT vs. PBQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQT has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than PBQQ's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQT vs. PBQQ - Dividend Comparison

QQQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.02%, more than PBQQ's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
PBQQ
PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF
0.01%0.01%0.00%
QQQT
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF
20.02%21.27%10.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, QQQT and PBQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QQQT has higher volatility (8.63%) compared to PBQQ (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQT dropped -22.50% vs PBQQ's -12.92%.

On 1-year performance, QQQT leads with 26.06% vs 17.92% for PBQQ. On fees, PBQQ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PBQQ has been the lower-risk option at 2.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQT has performed better with a 26.06% return vs 17.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PBQQ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for QQQT.

QQQT has the higher dividend yield at 20.02%, compared with 0.01% for PBQQ.

QQQT is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while PBQQ is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for QQQT and 0.50% for PBQQ.

PBQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQT and PBQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer