PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQS vs. PSCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQS vs. PSCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQS achieves a 27.27% return, which is significantly lower than PSCT's 54.18% return.


QQQS

1D
-1.70%
1M
5.91%
YTD
27.27%
6M
27.40%
1Y
79.99%
3Y*
15.89%
5Y*
10Y*

PSCT

1D
-1.18%
1M
15.45%
YTD
54.18%
6M
50.59%
1Y
98.87%
3Y*
23.44%
5Y*
13.84%
10Y*
16.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQS vs. PSCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
QQQS
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF
27.27%23.03%10.20%-1.94%6.56%
PSCT
Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF
54.18%18.63%-1.06%20.81%6.41%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQS and PSCT is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2022

0.83

The correlation between QQQS and PSCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQS vs. PSCT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQS
PSCT

Technology

42.1%
85.2%

Healthcare

41.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%

-

Industrials

4.8%
5.1%

Communication Services

2.4%

-

Energy

2.2%
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

1.0%

-

Financial Services

0.0%
3.7%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

QQQS
42.1%
PSCT
85.2%

Healthcare

QQQS
41.0%
PSCT

-

Consumer Cyclical

QQQS
5.2%
PSCT

-

Industrials

QQQS
4.8%
PSCT
5.1%

Communication Services

QQQS
2.4%
PSCT

-

Energy

QQQS
2.2%
PSCT
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

QQQS
1.4%
PSCT

-

Basic Materials

QQQS
1.0%
PSCT

-

Financial Services

QQQS
0.0%
PSCT
3.7%

Real Estate

QQQS

-

PSCT

-

Utilities

QQQS

-

PSCT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQS vs. PSCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQS
QQQS Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
QQQS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQS Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

PSCT
PSCT Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
PSCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCT Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCT Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQS vs. PSCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQSPSCTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.00

3.35

-0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.78

3.88

-0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.49

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.90

6.72

-0.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.70

28.34

-8.64

QQQS vs. PSCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQS Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is comparable to the PSCT Sharpe Ratio of 3.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQS and PSCT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQSPSCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.00

3.35

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.62

0.00

Drawdowns

QQQS vs. PSCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQS drawdown since its inception was -38.06%, smaller than the maximum PSCT drawdown of -40.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQS and PSCT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQSPSCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.06%

-40.44%

+2.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.63%

-14.80%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.32%

-33.96%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.55%

-1.18%

-1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.26%

-7.91%

-5.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.07%

3.50%

+0.57%

Volatility

QQQS vs. PSCT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) is 7.39%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT) has a volatility of 9.00%. This indicates that QQQS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQSPSCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.39%

9.00%

-1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.49%

21.05%

-2.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.90%

29.82%

-2.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.34%

27.68%

+0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.34%

26.67%

+1.67%

QQQS vs. PSCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCT's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQS vs. PSCT - Dividend Comparison

QQQS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, more than PSCT's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSCT
Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF
0.01%0.02%0.01%0.02%0.00%0.01%0.08%0.22%0.47%0.19%0.25%0.15%
QQQS
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF
2.73%3.48%0.80%0.68%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQS and PSCT have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSCT has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to QQQS (7.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQS dropped -38.06% vs PSCT's -40.44%.

On 3-year performance, PSCT leads with 23.44% vs 15.89% for QQQS. On fees, QQQS is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, QQQS has been the lower-risk option at 7.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PSCT has performed better with a 23.44% return vs 15.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQS is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCT.

QQQS has the higher dividend yield at 2.73%, compared with 0.01% for PSCT.

QQQS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while PSCT is Technology Equities. QQQS tracks Nasdaq Innovators Completion Cap Total Return Index, while PSCT tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QQQS and 0.29% for PSCT.

PSCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 3.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQS and PSCT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer