QQQS vs. CNBS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QQQS (Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF) and CNBS (Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Innovators Completion Cap Total Return Index, while CNBS is a Cannabis fund actively managed by Amplify. QQQS is passively managed, while CNBS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, QQQS returned 16.95%/yr vs -0.72%/yr for CNBS. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQQS charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CNBS.

Performance

QQQS vs. CNBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) and Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQS achieves a 29.69% return, which is significantly higher than CNBS's 4.70% return.

QQQS

• 1D: 1.90%
• 1M: 6.24%
• YTD: 29.69%
• 6M: 27.78%
• 1Y: 82.03%
• 3Y*: 16.95%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CNBS

• 1D: 6.54%
• 1M: 0.77%
• YTD: 4.70%
• 6M: 26.27%
• 1Y: 91.63%
• 3Y*: -0.72%
• 5Y*: -32.48%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQS vs. CNBS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
QQQS Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF	29.69%	23.03%	10.20%	-1.94%	6.56%
CNBS Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF	4.70%	15.33%	-29.41%	-16.11%	-18.08%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQS and CNBS is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2022	0.39

QQQS vs. CNBS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQQS	CNBS
Technology	42.1%	10.7%
Healthcare	41.0%	63.1%
Consumer Cyclical	5.2%	3.4%
Industrials	4.8%	0.1%
Communication Services	2.4%	-
Energy	2.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.4%	7.0%
Basic Materials	1.0%	-
Financial Services	0.0%	1.9%
Real Estate	-	13.8%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

QQQS vs. CNBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQS

QQQS Risk / Return Rank: 87
QQQS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
QQQS Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
QQQS Omega Ratio Rank: 76
QQQS Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
QQQS Martin Ratio Rank: 90

CNBS

CNBS Risk / Return Rank: 33
CNBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
CNBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
CNBS Omega Ratio Rank: 37
CNBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
CNBS Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQS vs. CNBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) and Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQQS	CNBS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.07	0.88	+2.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.85	2.02	+1.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.24	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.05	1.80	+4.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.20	3.30	+16.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQQS vs. CNBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQS Sharpe Ratio is 3.07, which is higher than the CNBS Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQS and CNBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQQS	CNBS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.07	0.88	+2.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	-0.39	+1.04

Drawdowns

QQQS vs. CNBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQS drawdown since its inception was -38.06%, smaller than the maximum CNBS drawdown of -95.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQS and CNBS.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQS	CNBS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.06%	-95.71%	+57.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.63%	-51.25%	+37.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.32%	-73.41%	+39.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-93.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.69%	-90.88%	+90.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.25%	-71.27%	+58.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.07%	27.83%	-23.76%

Volatility

QQQS vs. CNBS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) is 7.46%, while Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) has a volatility of 18.65%. This indicates that QQQS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQS	CNBS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.46%	18.65%	-11.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.55%	76.84%	-58.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.84%	105.28%	-78.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.34%	64.80%	-36.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.34%	61.37%	-33.03%

QQQS vs. CNBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CNBS's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQS vs. CNBS - Dividend Comparison

QQQS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, while CNBS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CNBS Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF	0.00%	0.00%	43.54%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.58%	0.58%
QQQS Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF	2.68%	3.48%	0.80%	0.68%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQS and CNBS in my portfolio?

QQQS and CNBS have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQQS or CNBS?

CNBS has higher volatility (18.65%) compared to QQQS (7.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQS dropped -38.06% vs CNBS's -95.71%.

Which ETF is better, QQQS or CNBS?

On 3-year performance, QQQS leads with 16.95% vs -0.72% for CNBS. On fees, QQQS is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, QQQS has been the lower-risk option at 7.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQQS or CNBS?

Over the 3-year period, QQQS has performed better with a 16.95% return vs -0.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQS or CNBS?

QQQS is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CNBS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQS or CNBS?

QQQS has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 0.00% for CNBS.

What is the main difference between QQQS and CNBS?

QQQS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while CNBS is Cannabis. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QQQS and 0.75% for CNBS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.