QQQP vs. CRMG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QQQP (Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF) and CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QQQP returned 61.35% vs -73.99% for CRMG. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQQP charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CRMG.

Performance

QQQP vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQP achieves a 26.65% return, which is significantly higher than CRMG's -71.26% return.

QQQP

• 1D: -5.26%
• 1M: -1.02%
• YTD: 26.65%
• 6M: 23.33%
• 1Y: 61.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRMG

• 1D: 4.23%
• 1M: -29.64%
• YTD: -71.26%
• 6M: -71.01%
• 1Y: -73.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQP vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QQQP Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF	26.65%	73.03%
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF	-71.26%	-0.29%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQP and CRMG is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025	0.30

Return for Risk

QQQP vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQP

QQQP Risk / Return Rank: 53
QQQP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
QQQP Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
QQQP Omega Ratio Rank: 50
QQQP Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
QQQP Martin Ratio Rank: 55

CRMG

CRMG Risk / Return Rank: 1
CRMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
CRMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
CRMG Omega Ratio Rank: 1
CRMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
CRMG Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQP vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQQP	CRMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	-0.97	+2.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	-1.82	+4.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	0.79	+0.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.43	-0.97	+3.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.72	-1.70	+10.43

QQQP vs. CRMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQP Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the CRMG Sharpe Ratio of -0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQP and CRMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQQP vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQP drawdown since its inception was -42.50%, smaller than the maximum CRMG drawdown of -79.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQP and CRMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQP	CRMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.50%	-79.83%	+37.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.35%	-76.80%	+51.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.10%	-78.97%	+71.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.26%	-39.18%	+31.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.05%	43.41%	-36.36%

Volatility

QQQP vs. CRMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) is 15.55%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) has a volatility of 32.53%. This indicates that QQQP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQP	CRMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.55%	32.53%	-16.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.56%	63.74%	-36.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.61%	76.12%	-41.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.42%	75.39%	-30.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.42%	75.39%	-30.97%

QQQP vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQP has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQP vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison

Neither QQQP nor CRMG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQP and CRMG in my portfolio?

QQQP and CRMG have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQQP or CRMG?

CRMG has higher volatility (32.53%) compared to QQQP (15.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQP dropped -42.50% vs CRMG's -79.83%.

Which ETF is better, QQQP or CRMG?

On 1-year performance, QQQP leads with 61.35% vs -73.99% for CRMG. On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, QQQP has been the lower-risk option at 15.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQQP or CRMG?

Over the 1-year period, QQQP has performed better with a 61.35% return vs -73.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQP or CRMG?

CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for QQQP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQP or CRMG?

QQQP and CRMG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between QQQP and CRMG?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for QQQP and 0.75% for CRMG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.