QQQN vs. VOT

Last updated Jul 19, 2026

QQQN (VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF) and VOT (Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - QQQN tracks the Nasdaq Q-50 Index while VOT tracks the CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. QQQN charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VOT.

Performance

QQQN vs. VOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QQQN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VOT

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: -4.08%
• 6M: 3.13%
• YTD: 5.42%
• 1Y: 2.17%
• 3Y*: 11.87%
• 5Y*: 5.47%
• 10Y*: 11.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQN vs. VOT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF	10.52%

QQQN vs. VOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQQN	VOT
Technology	47.3%	34.0%
Healthcare	19.9%	8.5%
Consumer Cyclical	13.7%	11.1%
Industrials	8.7%	25.4%
Communication Services	5.5%	3.0%
Basic Materials	1.9%	1.6%
Utilities	1.6%	2.9%
Consumer Defensive	1.4%	0.7%
Energy	-	1.8%
Financial Services	-	6.4%
Real Estate	-	4.2%

Return for Risk

QQQN vs. VOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VOT

VOT Risk / Return Rank: 12
VOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
VOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
VOT Omega Ratio Rank: 12
VOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
VOT Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQN vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQQN	VOT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.18	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.37	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.04	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.19	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	0.56	—

Drawdowns

QQQN vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQN drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum VOT drawdown of -60.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQN and VOT.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQN	VOT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-60.16%	+60.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-15.96%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.77%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.19%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.24%	+4.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-9.91%	+9.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.37%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QQQN	VOT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.84%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.93%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	17.07%	-17.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	21.56%	-21.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	21.01%	-21.01%

QQQN vs. VOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQN has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VOT's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

QQQN vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison

QQQN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF	0.62%	0.64%	0.67%	0.71%	0.78%	0.34%	0.56%	0.78%	0.84%	0.72%	0.81%	0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, QQQN or VOT?

On fees, VOT is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQN or VOT?

VOT is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQN or VOT?

VOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for QQQN.

What is the main difference between QQQN and VOT?

QQQN tracks Nasdaq Q-50 Index, while VOT tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: VictoryShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQN and 0.05% for VOT.