PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQN vs. TSCM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQN vs. TSCM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN) and TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF (TSCM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


QQQN

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

TSCM

1D
0.40%
1M
-1.64%
6M
1.44%
YTD
2.32%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQN vs. TSCM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQN vs. TSCM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN) and TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF (TSCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QQQN vs. TSCM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQN vs. TSCM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQN drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum TSCM drawdown of -14.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQN and TSCM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQNTSCMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-14.87%

+14.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.30%

+6.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-5.34%

+5.34%

Volatility

QQQN vs. TSCM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQNTSCMDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

20.74%

-20.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

20.74%

-20.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

20.74%

-20.74%

QQQN vs. TSCM - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQN has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than TSCM's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQN vs. TSCM - Dividend Comparison

Neither QQQN nor TSCM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, QQQN is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQQN is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TSCM.

QQQN and TSCM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: VictoryShares and TimesSquare Capital Management. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQN and 0.55% for TSCM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQN and TSCM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer