QQQN vs. TSCM
QQQN (VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF) and TSCM (TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. QQQN is passively managed, while TSCM is actively managed. QQQN charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for TSCM.
Performance
QQQN vs. TSCM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QQQN
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
TSCM
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- 6M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 2.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QQQN vs. TSCM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF | 0.00% |
TSCM TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF | 14.73% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQN vs. TSCM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN) and TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF (TSCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQN vs. TSCM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQN drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum TSCM drawdown of -14.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQN and TSCM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQN | TSCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -14.87% | +14.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.30% | +6.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -5.34% | +5.34% |
Volatility
QQQN vs. TSCM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQN | TSCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 20.74% | -20.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 20.74% | -20.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 20.74% | -20.74% |
QQQN vs. TSCM - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQN has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than TSCM's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQN vs. TSCM - Dividend Comparison
Neither QQQN nor TSCM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, QQQN is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQN is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TSCM.
QQQN and TSCM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: VictoryShares and TimesSquare Capital Management. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQN and 0.55% for TSCM.
Find the right allocation for QQQN and TSCM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer