QQQM vs. SMH

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QQQM returned 17.06%/yr vs 37.89%/yr for SMH. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQQM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.

Performance

QQQM vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQM achieves a 16.72% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 66.10% return.

QQQM

• 1D: 1.54%
• 1M: 0.68%
• YTD: 16.72%
• 6M: 15.00%
• 1Y: 35.86%
• 3Y*: 27.25%
• 5Y*: 17.06%
• 10Y*: —

SMH

• 1D: 5.00%
• 1M: 5.58%
• YTD: 66.10%
• 6M: 62.81%
• 1Y: 137.42%
• 3Y*: 60.43%
• 5Y*: 37.89%
• 10Y*: 36.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQM vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	16.72%	20.85%	25.68%	55.01%	-32.52%	27.45%	6.67%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	66.10%	49.17%	39.10%	73.38%	-33.53%	42.13%	16.14%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQM and SMH is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020	0.87

The correlation between QQQM and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQM vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQQM	SMH
Technology	53.8%	100.0%
Communication Services	15.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	12.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	-
Healthcare	4.2%	-
Industrials	2.8%	-
Utilities	1.4%	-
Basic Materials	1.1%	-
Energy	0.6%	-
Financial Services	0.2%	-
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

QQQM vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 69
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 71
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 68

SMH

SMH Risk / Return Rank: 96
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 94
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQM vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQQM	SMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	4.27	-2.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.78	4.33	-1.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.62	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.01	9.26	-6.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.44	34.80	-23.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQQM vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQM Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 4.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQM and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQQM	SMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.16	4.27	-2.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	1.08	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.13	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	0.33	+0.47

Drawdowns

QQQM vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQM drawdown since its inception was -35.04%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQM and SMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQM	SMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.04%	-84.96%	+49.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.96%	-14.93%	+2.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.70%	-35.74%	+13.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.04%	-45.30%	+10.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.04%	-6.23%	+2.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.24%	-41.07%	+32.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.14%	3.96%	-0.82%

Volatility

QQQM vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) is 6.83%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 15.45%. This indicates that QQQM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQM	SMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.83%	15.45%	-8.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.15%	26.71%	-13.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.70%	32.42%	-15.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.34%	35.32%	-12.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.20%	32.75%	-10.55%

QQQM vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQM vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.43%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	0.18%	0.31%	0.44%	0.60%	1.18%	0.51%	0.69%	1.50%	1.88%	1.43%	0.80%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQM and SMH in my portfolio?

QQQM and SMH have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQQM or SMH?

SMH has higher volatility (15.45%) compared to QQQM (6.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQM dropped -35.04% vs SMH's -84.96%.

Which ETF is better, QQQM or SMH?

On 5-year performance, SMH leads with 37.89% vs 17.06% for QQQM. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QQQM has been the lower-risk option at 6.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQQM or SMH?

Over the 5-year period, SMH has performed better with a 37.89% return vs 17.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQM or SMH?

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQM or SMH?

QQQM has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.

What is the main difference between QQQM and SMH?

QQQM is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SMH is Semiconductors. QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QQQM and 0.35% for SMH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.27 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.