PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQM vs. QQQS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQQM vs. QQQS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQQM vs. QQQS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
-4.64%20.85%25.68%55.01%-0.69%
QQQS
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF
1.41%23.03%10.20%-1.94%6.56%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQM achieves a -4.64% return, which is significantly lower than QQQS's 1.41% return.


QQQM

1D
0.12%
1M
-4.05%
YTD
-4.64%
6M
-2.75%
1Y
30.45%
3Y*
23.07%
5Y*
13.26%
10Y*

QQQS

1D
0.62%
1M
-3.92%
YTD
1.41%
6M
2.08%
1Y
63.47%
3Y*
9.13%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQQM vs. QQQS - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQS's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

QQQM vs. QQQS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQS
QQQS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
QQQS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQS Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQS Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQM vs. QQQS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQMQQQSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.05

1.64

-0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.63

2.23

-0.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.28

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

3.26

-1.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.03

11.19

-4.17

QQQM vs. QQQS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQM Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the QQQS Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQM and QQQS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQMQQQSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

1.64

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.39

+0.25

Correlation

The correlation between QQQM and QQQS is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QQQM vs. QQQS - Dividend Comparison

QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than QQQS's 3.43% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.53%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%
QQQS
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF
3.43%3.48%0.80%0.68%0.04%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

QQQM vs. QQQS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQM drawdown since its inception was -35.04%, smaller than the maximum QQQS drawdown of -38.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQM and QQQS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQMQQQSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.04%

-38.06%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

-13.63%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.75%

-7.24%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.47%

-13.82%

+5.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

4.82%

-1.34%

Volatility

QQQM vs. QQQS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) is 6.37%, while Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) has a volatility of 10.00%. This indicates that QQQM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQQMQQQSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.37%

10.00%

-3.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.78%

19.97%

-7.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.43%

30.75%

-8.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.23%

28.40%

-6.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.26%

28.40%

-6.14%